OG啊，不是我水平太低，实在是你的解释自我矛盾啊...

Consumers may not think of household cleaning products to be hazardous substances, but many of them can be harmful to health, especially if they are used improperly.
(A) Consumers may not think of household cleaning products to be
(B) Consumers may not think of household cleaning products being
(C) A consumer may not think of their household cleaning products being
(D) A consumer may not think of household cleaning products as
(E) Household cleaning products may not be thought of, by consumers, as

OG12-52. To Josephine Baker, Paris was her home long before it was fashionable to be an expatriate, and she remained
in France during the Second World War as a performer and an intelligence agent for the Resistance.
(A) To Josephine Baker, Paris was her home long before it was fashionable to be an expatriate,
(B) For Josephine Baker, long before it was fashionable to be an expatriate, Paris was her home,
(C) Josephine Baker made Paris her home long before to be an expatriate was fashionable,
(D) Long before it was fashionable to be an expatriate, Josephine Baker made Paris her home,
(E) Long before it was fashionable being an expatriate, Paris was home to Josephine Baker,

To LS:
这一题Consumers may not think of household cleaning products to be hazardous substances, but many of them can be harmful to health, especially if they are used improperly.
(A) Consumers may not think of household cleaning products to be
(B) Consumers may not think of household cleaning products being
(C) A consumer may not think of their household cleaning products being
(D) A consumer may not think of household cleaning products as
(E) Household cleaning products may not be thought of, by consumers, as
首先E选项，我不认为它有指代问题，by consumers只是插入语，另外OG说E选项之所以错是被动语态；至于另外一题，我认为OG的解释中所暗示的是一种preference,而consumer这题符合这个preference

[/quote

lz啊，哎，仔细看下你会发现是自家的想法自相矛盾

首先你的逻辑是以第二个的解释为基础
那我们来看看第二题的解释。

的确如你所说，认为主语相同更clearly 因为： Josephine Baker made Paris her home would clearly parallel she remained in France.
注意这个地方， og认为他之所以clearly，因为clearly parallel，parallel是最终原因

现在看透了这个解释， 来看第一题
lz也说了，og认为e是被动所以错，但是正因为og没说e是因为被动错而不是其她原因更说明第二题解释的合理性

因为第二个解释的最终依据是：Josephine Baker made Paris her home would clearly parallel she remained in France.这里两句话主语都是baker。也就是说明baker即把巴黎当家又带在法国，这当然parallel

而第一题e之所以错，就是因为e中被动使得e中两句不能parallel。前一个是被动，后一个是主动。句子结构和语态不能parallel了，还考虑主语parallel有何用？所以og认为e的主要问题是被动，恰巧是这个被动让lz的assumption 变得unfounded了

换句话说，lz举的这两个例子，认为第一题的解释weaken了第二题的解释，但是正好相反，第一题解释support了第二题解释

To LS:
这一题Consumers may not think of household cleaning products to be hazardous substances, but many of them can be harmful to health, especially if they are used improperly.
(A) Consumers may not think of household cleaning products to be
(B) Consumers may not think of household cleaning products being
(C) A consumer may not think of their household cleaning products being
(D) A consumer may not think of household cleaning products as
(E) Household cleaning products may not be thought of, by consumers, as
首先E选项，我不认为它有指代问题，by consumers只是插入语，另外OG说E选项之所以错是被动语态；至于另外一题，我认为OG的解释中所暗示的是一种preference,而consumer这题符合这个preference

[/quote

lz啊，哎，仔细看下你会发现是自家的想法自相矛盾

首先你的逻辑是以第二个的解释为基础
那我们来看看第二题的解释。

的确如你所说，认为主语相同更clearly 因为： Josephine Baker made Paris her home would clearly parallel she remained in France.
注意这个地方， og认为他之所以clearly，因为clearly parallel，parallel是最终原因

现在看透了这个解释， 来看第一题
lz也说了，og认为e是被动所以错，但是正因为og没说e是因为被动错而不是其她原因更说明第二题解释的合理性

因为第二个解释的最终依据是：Josephine Baker made Paris her home would clearly parallel she remained in France.这里两句话主语都是baker。也就是说明baker即把巴黎当家又带在法国，这当然parallel

而第一题e之所以错，就是因为e中被动使得e中两句不能parallel。前一个是被动，后一个是主动。句子结构和语态不能parallel了，还考虑主语parallel有何用？所以og认为e的主要问题是被动，恰巧是这个被动让lz的assumption 变得unfounded了

换句话说，lz举的这两个例子，认为第一题的解释weaken了第二题的解释，但是正好相反，第一题解释support了第二题解释