求助 39和104中in order to和 to do的区别

mia113 · 发表于 2011-8-24 20:21:16

39.In 1527 King Henry VIII sought to have his marriage to Queen Catherine annulled so as to marry Anne Boleyn.
a.so as to marry
b.and so could be married to
c.to be married to
d.so that he could marry
e in order that he would marry
OG说 c 应该把不定式to do改为in order to do (暂且不考虑be married的问题)

104
El Niño, the periodic abnormal warming of the sea
surface off Peru, a phenomenon in which changes in
the ocean and atmosphere combine allowing the warm
water that has accumulated in the western Paci?c to
?ow back to the east.

(A) a phenomenon in which changes in the ocean
and atmosphere combine allowing the warm
water that has accumulated
(B) a phenomenon where changes in the ocean and
atmosphere are combining to allow the warm
water that is accumulating
(C) a phenomenon in which ocean and atmosphere
changes combine and which allows the warm
water that is accumulated
(D) is a phenomenon in which changes in the ocean
and atmosphere combine to allow the warm
water that has accumulated
(E) is a phenomenon where ocean and atmosphere
changes are combining and allow the warm
water accumulating
OG说A中 changes combine (instransitive) in order to allow...所以要将allowing改成to allow表目的，这样不是和上面39矛盾了？还是说因为这里combine是个不及物动词所以就可以用to do代替in order to do？（先暂且不考虑A的其他错误）

以前觉得in order to do和to do表目的是可以互换，后来发现不行，但这里104又可以·想请问下大家到底是怎么回事谢谢了·

myancamel · 发表于 2011-8-25 00:52:17

不理解你的问题

in order to do和 to do几乎一样

这里也是

糊涂的小黑 · 发表于 2011-8-25 09:25:00

一个意思，但是后者比前者简洁

mia113 · 发表于 2011-8-25 10:38:11

我之前也觉得是一个意思
可是不知道为什么39题中 OG说要把C to be married to 改成in order to be married to (先暂时不考虑be married的问题·)

toogy123 · 发表于 2011-12-28 09:43:38

同样的疑问啊，呼唤高人！~~~~

奈奈奈 · 发表于 2011-12-28 11:00:47

还有一个区别: to do 可以作主语， in order to 不可以

toogy123 · 发表于 2011-12-28 11:50:36

我之前也觉得是一个意思
可是不知道为什么39题中 OG说要把C to be married to 改成in order to be married to (先暂时不考虑be married的问题·)

-- by 会员 mia113 (2011/8/25 10:38:11)

同问~~~还是不理解这里为啥换成in order to ,总觉得他俩差不多， to 还更简洁呢，当然后面的be married to 的错误很明显，就是不明白to 这块~~~~

michaelmay17 · 发表于 2011-12-28 15:00:52

首先我记得Manhattan里说gmat不觉得In order to 不简洁，其次in order to 只能表示目的而 to do 不仅能表示目的还能表示结果，所以有时会造成ambiguous。我觉得这是他们使用上的区别

本贴相关题目 OG-12-SC-39 (QGKQ)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

求助 39和104中in order to和 to do的区别

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()