求NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN人来帮我看看这道题。。。。making到底是干嘛用的。。。（此题此方面无讨论帖）

hellocrystal · 发表于 2011-10-14 21:35:16

Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established the Library of Congress.

本题句子结构分析：Approved April 24，1800,（过去分词做定语）, the act of Congress （主语）that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city（that从句解释主语）, Washington, D.C.（插入语）, also established（谓语）the Library of Congress（宾语）

A. Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress（国会法） that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also establishedthe act of Congress是主语也是逻辑主语；法律法规的具体的内容要用v-ing修饰，比如法规规定捕的鱼必须小于一定尺寸，但此处made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C.意为“提供了政府迁移的相关条款”，并没有说明法律法规的具体内容，所以限定性定从更合适。

B. The act of Congress, which was approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established making跳跃which从句修饰the act of congress逻辑上对了但句式过度复杂（且不论making的正确与否）。

一个名词（The act of Congress,）后面既然有了定语从句, 在插入一个分词修饰显得很不利索

C. The act of Congress approved April 24, 1800, which made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., and establishedwhich指代太远不及A好；and的插入使得前面分句没有谓语，后面分句没有主语

D. Approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., the act of Congress also established

E. Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also establishing

我的问题是：B里面的making到底是干嘛
prep 08版说：making作为伴随approved的结果状语，逻辑意思不合理，其应该是说明act的作用，修饰act
我的疑问：为什么making放着好端端的主句主语The act of Congress不去修饰，偏偏要修饰定语从句的谓语动词？这种情况我以前都没有碰见啊。。。
2、这个making存在不存在夹心修饰的现象？我个人认为这里符合：S,v-ing，VO的格式，那么making会夹心修饰established的么？

hellocrystal · 发表于 2011-10-15 00:13:36

我顶

xuromeo · 发表于 2011-11-4 15:32:59

我也有相同疑问

本贴相关题目 GMATPrep-2008E1-SC-219 | TN-09-SC-20 (IPWD)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

求NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN人来帮我看看这道题。。。。making到底是干嘛用的。。。（此题此方面无讨论帖）

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()