OG11TH VERBAL REVIEW 52

zxkingsey · 发表于 2010-2-8 23:45:04

130. In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes ofOneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.

(A) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
(B) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their unlawful seizure of
(C) two upstate New York counties to owe restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of
(D) on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized
(E) on the restitution that two upstate New York counties owed to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of

E.D rule on...that 为什么错???

zxkingsey · 发表于 2010-2-9 19:15:17

自己顶~~

tintinc · 发表于 2011-2-24 23:21:14

我想请教这段话的中文意思。。。

lusfe · 发表于 2011-4-4 19:02:24

我想请教这段话的中文意思。。。

-- by 会员 tintinc (2011/2/24 23:21:14)

rule = pronounce

rule that 宣判+结果
rule on sth. 就sth.进行宣判

此题用rule on，句意不通

laria_line · 发表于 2011-4-4 19:51:46

我想请教这段话的中文意思。。。

-- by 会员 tintinc (2011/2/24 23:21:14)

是说法庭判定New York counties因为非法侵占印第安人的领土，向印第安人赔偿。

本贴相关题目 OG-2015V-SC-51 (PWPR)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

OG11TH VERBAL REVIEW 52

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()