ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In a 5-to-4 decision,the Supreme Court ruled that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2662|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG11TH VERBAL REVIEW 52

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-2-8 23:45:04 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
130. In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes ofOneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.

(A) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
(B) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their unlawful seizure of
(C) two upstate New York counties to owe restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of
(D) on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized
(E) on the restitution that two upstate New York counties owed to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of

E.D rule  on...that 为什么错???
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-9 19:15:17 | 只看该作者
自己顶~~
板凳
发表于 2011-2-24 23:21:14 | 只看该作者
我想请教这段话的中文意思。。。
地板
发表于 2011-4-4 19:02:24 | 只看该作者
我想请教这段话的中文意思。。。
-- by 会员 tintinc (2011/2/24 23:21:14)



rule = pronounce

rule that 宣判+结果
rule on sth. 就sth.进行宣判

此题用rule on,句意不通
5#
发表于 2011-4-4 19:51:46 | 只看该作者
我想请教这段话的中文意思。。。
-- by 会员 tintinc (2011/2/24 23:21:14)




是说法庭判定New York counties因为非法侵占印第安人的领土,向印第安人赔偿。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 00:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部