ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (XIRY)

00:00:00

Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both public and private employers that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are usually held by men.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 14189|回复: 15
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]关于require的用法

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-5-1 03:06:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]关于require的用法

require sb to do sth


require that


require of sb that


请问有没有require of sb to do sth这种用法,而且,require of sb that后面的使用方法和require that一样吗?只是使用虚拟语气就可以了吗?



例如:OG 109


Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both public and private employers that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are usually held by men.


(A)    that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are


(B) that pay for jobs historically held by women should be the same as for a job requiring comparable skills


(C) to pay the same in jobs historically held by women as in jobs of comparable skill that are


(D) to pay the same regardless of whether a job was historically held by women or is one demanding comparable skillsA


(E) to pay as much for jobs historically held by women as for a job demanding comparable skills



[此贴子已经被作者于2004-5-1 3:08:12编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2004-5-1 08:34:00 | 只看该作者

惯用法require sth of sb-〉变体require of sb sth,当sth很长的时候。sth可以是sth,名词性从句(not sure)。不知道doing行不行。


require of sb to do偶认为必错。


请指正。


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-5-1 8:34:44编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2004-5-1 09:35:00 | 只看该作者
tianwan gg, require of sb to do sth 这个词组,ets一会儿支持,一会儿反对,og上说人的是他,说鬼的也是他
地板
发表于 2004-5-1 09:53:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用zcx在2004-5-1 9:35:00的发言:
tianwan gg, require of sb to do sth 这个词组,ets一会儿支持,一会儿反对,og上说人的是他,说鬼的也是他

require of sb to do sth ETS没有说是对的呀?只有require sb to to sth 是对的。


5#
发表于 2004-5-1 12:11:00 | 只看该作者

   require of sb to do sth肯定错

   因为可以直接用require sb to do sth

6#
发表于 2004-5-1 12:23:00 | 只看该作者
require sth. of sb. to do可能可以,不过这里的to do是修饰sb.
7#
发表于 2004-5-1 12:24:00 | 只看该作者

参看og181。

8#
发表于 2004-5-1 22:27:00 | 只看该作者

OG181.        

Because of the enormous research and development expenditures required (B) of firms to survive in the electronics industry, an industry marked by rapid innovation and volatile demand, such firms tend to be very large.

The subject of the main clause (such firms) presumes a prior reference to the firms in question. Furthermore, the logical subject of to survive and the logical complement of required should be made explicit. All three demands are met by B, the best choice.

但这边的的required是做后置修饰补语用以修饰expenditures, 而OG又提到为了使to survive的主语firm和 required 的补语(expenditures)更为明显, 所以出现(B)这样的一个较佳的选项.

但是这例子是用在Because of的句型做补语的; 所以像平常一样require用在动词形式上, 倒底有没有 require of Sb to do Sth, 偶就不敢百分百肯定了. XDF有提到require的四种用法, 其中之一就是这. 只是偶到现在还是半信半疑的....

还请牛人指点.....

9#
发表于 2004-5-1 22:43:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用tianwan在2004-5-1 8:34:00的发言:

惯用法require sth of sb-〉变体require of sb sth,当sth很长的时候。sth可以是sth,名词性从句(not sure)。不知道doing行不行。


require of sb to do偶认为必错。


Because of the enormous research and development expenditures( required (B) of firms to survive in the electronics industry), an industry marked by rapid innovation and volatile demand, such firms tend to be very large.

句中的 required (B) of firms to survive in the electronics industry)是作为the enormous research and development expenditures的修饰成分。

调整语序为:required (B) of firms the enormous research and development expenditures to survive in the electronics industry 。

后面的to survive in the electronics industry 是用来修饰前面这个required (B) of firms the enormous research and development expenditures

偶觉得:即便有require of sb.sth. to do...这个用法,其中的sth.一定不可以少,另外,to do也一定不是require的逻辑宾语,而是表require目的的不定式。

10#
发表于 2004-5-2 21:53:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用JerryGuan在2004-5-1 22:43:00的发言:

以下是引用tianwan在2004-5-1 8:34:00的发言:

惯用法require sth of sb-〉变体require of sb sth,当sth很长的时候。sth可以是sth,名词性从句(not sure)。不知道doing行不行。


require of sb to do偶认为必错。


Because of the enormous research and development expenditures( required (B) of firms to survive in the electronics industry), an industry marked by rapid innovation and volatile demand, such firms tend to be very large.

句中的 required (B) of firms to survive in the electronics industry)是作为the enormous research and development expenditures的修饰成分。

调整语序为:required (B) of firms the enormous research and development expenditures to survive in the electronics industry 。

后面的to survive in the electronics industry 是用来修饰前面这个required (B) of firms the enormous research and development expenditures

偶觉得:即便有require of sb.sth. to do...这个用法,其中的sth.一定不可以少,另外,to do也一定不是require的逻辑宾语,而是表require目的的不定式。



gg的话有道理,目的不定式,欧觉得像,og中的109,138,181让偶一都雾水,搞不清楚谁错谁对,偶记得gemj的一个将如何学语法的帖子也说ets阴毒,对这个词说法不一
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-6-14 14:25
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部