ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 5008|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

再问OG12-SC-133

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-12-8 12:34:25 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
133.Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp’s ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.
(A) requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect
(B) requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
(C) that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect
(D) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
(E) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting


答案选B,我自己查了薄冰语法手册,但是还是搞不明白一个问题,就是with requiring,这个结构是前面加with的现在分词独立结构么?

谢谢NN指点!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2009-12-8 12:47:12 | 只看该作者
saying that their compliance (with laws requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets) is protecting adult sea turtles
....
with laws (requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets)
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-12-8 13:02:35 | 只看该作者
saying that their compliance (with laws requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets) is protecting adult sea turtles
....
with laws (requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets)
-- by 会员 kray003 (2009/12/8 12:47:12)



这个句子结构我理解,不过with是什么作用呢?呵呵
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-12-12 16:30:34 | 只看该作者
今天看第二遍,又发现另外一个问题,就是with law requiring和with law to require,B是正确答案,with law requiring是better idiom,查了一些外国的g论坛,除了常用以外,能不能告诉我是为什么?还是不大明白。不定式结构怎么不好?
谢谢NN解答!!!  对了,自己顶!!!
5#
发表于 2009-12-13 11:58:33 | 只看该作者

laws是compliance with中with的宾语,requiring是修饰laws的分词;is protecting 是compliance的动词

就是说,他们的网对法律做到了compliance,哪个法律呢?要求安装turtle-excluder devices的法律;这个compliance呢,起到了保护作用

with laws requiring不是一个固定结构吧?就是需要考虑requiring和 to require那个修饰laws更准确。

kray003的解释很清楚啊
6#
发表于 2009-12-13 18:02:18 | 只看该作者
不動式主要用來表目的...所以to require相對來說不太適用.
7#
发表于 2011-4-19 08:03:05 | 只看该作者
这里compliance with是习惯用语,这个with和后面的分词没有任何关系。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-3 02:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部