- UID
- 511976
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-2-20
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
我脸皮是真够厚的- - 感激不尽,Anyway.
ISSUE131“Governmentsshould not be responsible for regulating business and organizations. Societywill benefit more if the business and organizations establish and regulatethemselves in own standard.”
The speaker asserts thatGovernment should let free companies rather than establishing regulation forthem. However, the speaker unnecessarily extend this broad assertion to anirreversible extreme while overlooks other factors that may affect this issue.On balance, my points of statements and contention with the author involvesdeep and fundamental analysis as discussed below.
To begin with, free of legislationand regulation may lead business and organizations lead to chaos. In the modelof perfect competition, there are no monopoly, but, in the real world, thissituation rarely exists. Monopoly companies will find a business world without regulationcomfortable to grow up. Merger, methods not ethical, or even illegal behaviormay be brought to this competition. For example, there’s a bear factory of highlocal fame , BaoTu, in my hometown. Three years later, for there’s negativereport concerning the quality of the bottles they use. Since then, the fame ofBaotu bear has been severely damaged and fewer and fewer people chose itsproduct. Not long after that event, it has to close. However, six month beforenow, Baotu factory was found to be set up by another giant QingAn in theProvince and the report concerning the quality of its bottles was made up by a journalistdriven by the boss of QingAn. I assume that this event is a terrible aftermathof lacking regulation and legislation of business world.
However, overregulation wouldresult in the suppress of creativity and productivity of people and companies.A qualified government tends to guard the atmosphere of fair competition andact on the interest of local business. I suppose that, in such an atmospherementioned above, business will be left growing swift and build sector standardsand ethic principles on their own. The fast development of ShenZhen, a economicexperimenting city in China, shows the significance of “free development”. Inthe 80th last century, China began to adopt the famous “Open-up”policy.Without the stringent regulation in the mainland, Shenzhen was developing in anamazing rate that the world regarded as miracle. People’s creativity are freedand many things deemed impossible happened here, in the special stage ofhistory.
In sum, the conclusion in the argument that government should not beresponsible for regulation is anexcessive one. What we should do is to find a proper balance on the extent ofgovernmental legislation and leave the business sector develop on their own. |
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2010-11-29 23:34:13
收藏
收藏
楼主
