prep语法笔记-61 就快考试了，求解= =|||

小虾头 · 发表于 2009-12-1 02:07:08

61. (27648-!-item-!-188;#058&003611)

Researchersin Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what itappears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of humanancestors who systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.

(A)it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence ofhuman ancestors who

(B)it appears had been an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and is stunningevidence that human ancestors

(C)it appears to have been an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and is stunningevidence that human ancestors

(D)appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that humanancestors

(E)appears that it is an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence ofhuman ancestors who

这道题我选c，但是解说说应该选d，并且说在a b c中，what和it都是what从句的主语，结构错误。
不太懂。。

求助

lpdeng · 发表于 2009-12-1 07:57:59

这里what 引导的句子做from的宾语（是不是宾语亚？@_@）. what 在what从句里面做主语。所以what 从句里面再加上it作主语就重复了！

比如说：
I know what you like. 对。这里what 作like 的宾语。 what 引导的从句作know的宾语。
I know what you like it. 错

Boot · 发表于 2009-12-1 08:54:14

IMO D
(Researchers in Germany have) unearthed (400,000-year-old wooden spears) (from what appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground), (stunning evidence that humanancestors humanancestors systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed).

from后面应该接名词，使用what引导名词性从句。
C的结构很混乱。
1.如你所说，what在名词性从句里是作成分的，正常状态下我们都说it appears to be，改为名词性从句就成为what appears to be，what代替了it的成分。而肯定不能有双主语的。
2.have been很突兀，如非要用完成时的话，have appeared to be更好吧。
3.逻辑意思混乱，虽然后半句的并列结构语法上没啥大问题，可以表示为what is stunning evidence。但是这句的意思是stunning evidence解释说明这个场地的。而非并列的意思。

小虾头 · 发表于 2009-12-1 09:34:56

oh!谢谢两位！那么from后面接的是名词，而且接的是what引导的宾语从句对不对呢？

lpdeng · 发表于 2009-12-1 12:13:58

boot解释得很好饿！这样说from后面接的是what引导的名词性宾语从句了~

prep语法笔记-61 就快考试了，求解= =|||

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()