我认为,原句的意思是: 为了能够不管在牛市或熊市都取得好的(投资)结果,Asset allocators(也就是所谓的理财专家)建立各种投资组合,而这些投资组合经常以共同基金的形式(出现)。 所以,在原句中,with the intention to...是修饰动词create. 如果采用intended,则变成了修饰portfolios了,意思变为: Asset allocators(也就是所谓的理财专家)建立各种投资组合——而这些投资组合经常以共同基金的形式(出现)——这些投资组合是用来达到不管在牛市或熊市都能取得好的(投资)结果的目的。 所以,我认为,原句用了with the intention是用来修饰create,如果选C:intended就改变了原句的意思。 而在OG212中,原句采用了aimed at修饰policy,在E中改用with aim to则变成修饰The Baldrick Manufacturing Company了,改变了原句意思,所以不对。 但这并不是说,不管在何种场合分词结构就优先于with结构,而是要看原句采用了哪种结构以及原句的逻辑意思是否合理,如果原句的逻辑意思是合理的,我们就没有理由去选用另一种结构来改变原句的逻辑意思。 所以,我认为在本题选A似乎更有道理,请各位NN指教。 212. The Baldrick Manufacturing Company has for
several years followed a policy aimed at decreasing operating costs and improving the efficiency of its distribution system.
(A) aimed at decreasing operating costs and improving
(B) aimed at the decreasing of operating costs and to improve
(C) aiming at the decreasing of operating costs and improving
(D) the aim of which is the decreasing of operating costs and improving
(E) with the aim to decrease operating costs and to improve
|