ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Thelonious Monk, who was a jazz pianist and composer, produced a body of work both rooted in the stride-piano tradition of Willie (The Lion) Smith and Duke Ellington, yet in many ways he stood apart from the mainstream jazz repertory.

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3016|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG13 SC 92~~THX!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-1-20 10:09:28 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Thelonious Monk, who was a jazz pianist and composer, produced a body of work both rootedin the stride-piano tradition of Willie (The Lion) Smith and Duke Ellington, yet in many ways he stood apart from the mainstream jazz repertory

(A) Thelonious Monk, who was a jazz pianist and composer, produced a body of work both rooted



(B) Thelonious Monk, the jazz pianist and composer, produced a body of work that was rooted both



(C) Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk, who produced a body of work rooted



(D) Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk produced a body of work that was rooted



(E) Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk produced a body of work rooted both

对于both的错误谁能解释下~~~谢谢

我觉得both rootedin the stride-piano tradition of Willie (The Lion) Smith and (rooted in)Duke Ellington 也是可以的呀(and后面经常省略)难道是我意思理解错了还是神马的?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-1-20 11:05:09 | 只看该作者
Thelonious Monk, who was a jazz pianist and composer, produced a body of work both rooted in the stride-piano tradition of Willie (The Lion) Smith and Duke Ellington, yet in many ways he stood apart from the mainstream jazz repertory.

tradition of  [ Willie (The Lion) Smith and Duke Ellington ]

假如说 both rooted in tradition of W Smith and rooted in Duke E 的话,  由于rooted in 出现在both 之后, 所以 and 后要重复 rooted in.

省略的情况是rooted in 出现在 both 前面, 即 rooted in both W Smith and Duke E.  

但是不管省略问题, A是有逻辑错误的, 因为只有一个tradition.

rooted in Duke Ellington 是个什么情况... 根植在一个人身上? 还是 rooted in tradition of Duke E
板凳
发表于 2013-6-8 05:16:04 | 只看该作者
我也认为, both root in the tradition of WS and DE, 如果是这个结构,应该是 tradition 和 DE平行。WS只是修饰语一部分。 显然两者不平行。 再看别的both 要求结构平行,那更加的不平行了。
所以我认为这里Both就是干扰项。排除。
地板
发表于 2016-6-6 12:06:22 | 只看该作者
有人知道为什么这里root用被动吗?怎么理解呢
5#
发表于 2016-6-14 18:39:12 | 只看该作者
五只羊 发表于 2016-6-6 12:06
有人知道为什么这里root用被动吗?怎么理解呢

Work 肯定不能自己root in 啊。这里应该是起源于,以什么什么为基础的意思吧。
6#
发表于 2016-6-29 12:28:40 | 只看该作者
CJHHELEN 发表于 2016-6-14 18:39
Work 肯定不能自己root in 啊。这里应该是起源于,以什么什么为基础的意思吧。 ...

谢谢你的解答~很有帮助
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 00:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部