ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2916|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG11-57与OG11-102同样问题解释不同请注意

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-3-24 23:20:00 | 只看该作者

OG11-57与OG11-102同样问题解释不同请注意

57.      Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it,
                their grip on Algeria was always insecure.
                

(A)         if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure

(B)         without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure

(C)        their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it

(D)        without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria

(E)         never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it

C        The verb was should be the conditional would be; pronoun it is ambiguous and could  refer to either Morocco or Algeria 但是很显然Algeria是on's object,在102题中说是代词不能做direct object

102. Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, capitalized on her keen observation and love of the  natural world.

(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives,

(B) In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter

(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter

(D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrationsC

(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and

E的解释:Them cannot refer to book illustrations because the plural noun is the object of the preposition in.

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2008-3-25 10:10:00 | 只看该作者
UP
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-3-25 13:25:00 | 只看该作者
大家讨论一下这个吧,难道我又钻牛角尖了吗?
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2008-3-25 18:15:00 | 只看该作者

代词究竟可不可以指代介词后面的宾语呢?

请帮忙解释一下,有点晕

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-3-26 17:19:00 | 只看该作者
UP Again
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-3-26 20:48:00 | 只看该作者

没有人发现这个问题吗?

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-3-26 21:37:00 | 只看该作者
UP Again
8#
发表于 2008-3-27 04:20:00 | 只看该作者
楼主请搜索一下OG11-102,以前有NN专门分析过。现在语法区NN不如从前多了,而且也很少出来说话,所以不如看看以前讨论的帖子,比在这干等强。
9#
发表于 2008-8-6 22:17:00 | 只看该作者
小弟的淺見
OG11-57  E 選項
never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it 
it 不清楚指代的是Algeria 或是 Morocco. 但此题应该是要指代Morrocao 所以此选项产生歧异
既然正确的是带Morroco 他并不是该句的宾语  也就不能与102的E选项相比较
10#
发表于 2008-9-11 15:49:00 | 只看该作者
up
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-30 18:12
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部