ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1700|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

有道argument没找出思路,NN帮忙看下吧

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-12-7 21:36:00 | 只看该作者

有道argument没找出思路,NN帮忙看下吧

2. The following appeared in an editorial from a magazine produced by an organization dedicated to environmental protection:

“In order to effectively reduce the amount of environmental damage that industrial manufacturing plants cause, those who manage the plants must be aware of the specific amount and types of damage caused by each of their various manufacturing processes. However, few corporations have enough financial incentive to monitor this information. In order to guarantee that corporations reduce the damage caused by their plants, the federal government should require every corporation to produce detailed annual reports on the environmental impact of their manufacturing process, and the government should impose stiff financial penalties for failure to produce these reports.”

Discuss how well reasoned . . .etc.

沙发
发表于 2008-12-14 01:51:00 | 只看该作者

只找到了3点错误,也很模糊。。。

1.第一句里的must很绝对,to effectively reduce the amount of environmental damage that industrial manufacturing plants cause不一定就要be aware of 。。。,也可以有其他更为有效的方法,比如说,改进生产,技术进步

2.gratuious assumption--由 In order to guarantee that corporations reduce the damage caused by their plants, the federal government should require 可知作者假设企业递交报告就可以降低污染生产,但作者provide no evidence去支持这个假设。同时,即使企业递交了报告也不一定就改进生产降低污染,这也有违结论。

3.政府的行为可行吗?--由于few corporations have enough financial incentive to monitor this information,和financial penalties for failure to produce these reports.”,企业的报告不一定真实而可能是应付。这样,整个argument is worthless.

共同讨论。。。。

板凳
发表于 2008-12-22 22:06:00 | 只看该作者

 

论证过程:must aware specifi amount and types of specifi 污染,

          Few incentive

 结论 government requirement and fine for failure

1 must aware ,夸大程度。企业知道部分,但不能准确知道所有污染物,有些连科学家都还有研究

2 MORE INCENTIVE 不能sufficient 产生报告。如上,即使more incentive 的企业知道部分污染物,但科学家还没有方法去研究出解决方法。

3 政府要求报告不一定能EFFECTIVELY REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE. 忽视他因。因为有些企业本身的解决方法相当昂贵,还没有feasible的方法。宁愿罚款。

WELCOME MORE DISCUSSION

地板
发表于 2008-12-29 12:32:00 | 只看该作者

drawbacks in logic and reasoning:

1.gratuitous assumption that "stiff financial penalties" is  "enough financial incentive to monitor this information";即使有罚款,也不一定足以产生足够的财务激励去监控这些信息;

2."Detailed annual reports " can't guarantee to improve the management team's awareness企业准备并提供具体的年报不代表会引起管理层对工厂产生的环境污染的重视。  


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-12-29 12:33:57编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-11 04:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部