885-sec3－21

xiaoyue45084508 · 发表于 2004-1-12 11:45:00

885-sec3－21
21. At the time of the Mexican agrarian revolution, the most radical faction, that of Zapata and his followers, proposed a return to communal ownership of land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards.
(A) land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards
(B) land, a form of ownership of the pre-Columbians and respected by the Spaniards
(C) land, respected by the Spaniards and a pre-Columbian form of ownership
(D) land in which a pre-Columbian form of ownership was respected by the Spaniards
(E) land that had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards

答案为A，请问E为何不对
谁能讲讲A为什么正确吗？谢谢！

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-1-12 18:20:18编辑过]

xiaoyue45084508 · 发表于 2004-1-12 18:21:00

顶一下

zjw007 · 发表于 2004-1-12 18:34:00

我也选了E,是不是因为that in E 修饰land, not ownership of land?

any idea NN 们?

dansy · 发表于 2004-1-12 18:42:00

007 是对的。原句可以理解成 “a return to communal ownership of land, (a return) to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards." E 中不是应修饰LAND，而应修饰OWNERSHIP。
个人意见。

xiaoyue45084508 · 发表于 2004-1-12 19:32:00

that修饰就近的名词，还是名词词组的中心词怎么判断呢？
如OG85
Out of America’s fascination with all things antique have grown a market for bygone styles of furniture and fixtures that are bringing back the chaise lounge, the overstuffed sofa, and the claw-footed bathtub.
(A) things antique have grown a market for bygone styles of furniture and fixtures that are bringing
(B) things antique has grown a market for bygone styles of furniture and fixtures that is bringing
(C) things that are antiques has grown a market for bygone styles of furniture and fixtures that bring
(D) antique things have grown a market for bygone styles of furniture and fixtures that are bringing
(E) antique things has grown a market for bygone styles of furniture and fixtures that bring
that 为什么又修饰market ，而不是就近修饰呢？

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-1-12 19:33:01编辑过]

dansy · 发表于 2004-1-12 19:42:00

A of B which/that 可修饰A，也可修饰B。根据句意判断。

xiaoyue45084508 · 发表于 2004-1-12 20:11:00

A of B which/that 可修饰A，也可修饰B。根据句意判断。
这就是我最搞不清楚的地方了。OG一会说which/that 修饰对象不明确，一会又明明白白修饰离which/that 那么远的名词，如上面那道OG85。
糊涂的很，能再解释一下吗？

dansy · 发表于 2004-1-12 20:19:00

MM，我只能帮到此了。

力所不能及。
你看看下面的连接试试。
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=8943&replyID=59642&skin=1

dreadpower · 发表于 2004-1-12 23:00:00

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=23&replyID=246744&ID=32235&skin=1

xiaoyue45084508 · 发表于 2004-1-13 12:41:00

谢谢大家！明白多了。

本贴相关题目 OG (MSNS)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

885-sec3－21

885-sec3－21

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()