ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1001|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LR-2002-06-4-19

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-11-6 21:03:00 | 只看该作者

LR-2002-06-4-19

Large-scale government projects desighed to benefit everyone——such as roads, schools, and bridges---usually benefit some small segments of society, initially at least, more than others. The more equally and widely political power is distributed among the citizenry, the less likely such projects are to receive funding. Hence, government by referendum rather than by means of elected representatives tends to diminish, not enhance, the welfare of a society.

问题是assumption

答案是A Large-scale government projects sometimes enhance the welfare of society.

一直想不明白为什么是这个选项?

希望大牛们赐教!谢啦!

沙发
发表于 2007-11-8 23:59:00 | 只看该作者

Hence, government by referendum rather than by means of elected representatives tends to diminish, not enhance, the welfare of a society.

这句话就是说明government by referendum 不enhance the welfare of a society

而第一个概念是large-scale government projects是benefit everyone的

那么为什么作者能从这一概念得出最后的结论呢?

就是因为至少large-scale government projects sometimes enhance the welfare of society的

否则(在KAPLAN叫DENIAL,POWERSOCRES叫NEGATION)

如果large-scale government projuects 根本没有sometimes enhance the welfare of society

那么怎么就能得出government by referendum就 diminish the welfare of society了呢?large-scale government projuects 也有可能啊

不知道自己说清楚没有,我比较差......

 

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-25 11:09
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部