ChaseDream
搜索
1234下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 15994|回复: 39
打印 上一主题 下一主题

关于一道GWD 6-13 语法题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-11-1 20:15:00 | 只看该作者

关于一道GWD 6-13 语法题

在做GWD 6-13 时,有一点没能搞懂,请那位NN 能指点一下,感谢先


Q13:


Floating in the waters of the equatorial Pacific, an array of buoys collects and transmits data on long-term interactions between the ocean and the atmosphere, interactions that affect global climate.




  • atmosphere, interactions that affect


  • atmosphere, with interactions affecting


  • atmosphere that affects


  • atmosphere that is affecting


  • atmosphere as affects

  • 答案是A,但为何B不对呢?,用带WITH 的独立结构不是ETS很喜欢的吗? 难道是WITH后面不能+N+DOING?

    沙发
    发表于 2004-11-1 21:39:00 | 只看该作者

    你能讲清楚with interactions affecting 的逻辑主语是谁么?

    这里不是考 with 短语, 是考修饰歧义。

    板凳
     楼主| 发表于 2004-11-2 14:30:00 | 只看该作者
    thanks I see , " with" is far away from the N:"interactions"
    地板
    发表于 2004-12-6 21:48:00 | 只看该作者
    可恶,TNND,我怎么什么都看不到啊!!
    5#
    发表于 2005-1-13 13:26:00 | 只看该作者

    to 第3楼:No, it's not because "with" is far away from the N:"interactions"

    interactions that affect global climate 是用独立逐个补充修饰前一个interactions, 而不是修饰主语。这样的话,interactions... with interactions就明显不对了。

    6#
    发表于 2005-3-8 09:34:00 | 只看该作者

    agree with billgong! 状语应该优先修饰主语(例似于with,like放在句末)

    7#
    发表于 2005-4-27 08:40:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用billgong在2005-1-13 13:26:00的发言:

    to 第3楼:No, it's not because "with" is far away from the N:"interactions"


    interactions that affect global climate 是用独立逐个补充修饰前一个interactions, 而不是修饰主语。这样的话,interactions... with interactions就明显不对了。


    独立主格结构有这种用法么,我怎么看像同位语,补充说明前面的内容???

    8#
    发表于 2005-5-9 11:12:00 | 只看该作者

    不是很能理解大家为什么都说with引导的伴随状语就一定要和主语相同?

    感觉只要伴随动作没有问题就可以了, 记的曾经在一个GWD的帖子里面谈到这个问题, 举个例子:

    He is climbing up the mountain, with Tom an Tina.

    这里只要with可以伴随动作climbing就可以了.

    这里的B的错误就是在句意上面无法伴随动作collect.

    9#
    发表于 2005-5-22 19:51:00 | 只看该作者

    感觉只要伴随动作没有问题就可以了, 记的曾经在一个GWD的帖子里面谈到这个问题, 举个例子:
    He is climbing up the mountain, with Tom an Tina.
    这里只要with可以伴随动作climbing就可以了.

    嗯,这个语法点确实不大好掌

            The Baldrick Manufacturing Company has for several years followed a policy aimed at decreasing operating costs and improving the efficiency of its distribution system.

    (A) aimed at decreasing operating costs and improving

    (B) aimed at the decreasing of operating costs and to improve

    (C) aiming at the decreasing of operating costs and improving

    (D) the aim of which is the decreasing of operating costs and improvingA

    (E) with the aim to decrease operating costs and to improve

    The best choice, A, offers an adjective phrase (aimed at 是形容词短语,不是动词过去分词) unequivocally modifying policy and exhibiting grammatical parallelism (decreasing... and improving). In choice B, the gerund the decreasing is not grammatically parallel with the infinitive to improve. Likewise, in C and D, the decreasing of... costs is not parallel with improving the efficiency. In E, the infinitives to decrease and to improve, while parallel, are less idiomatic than the prepositional phrase of decreasing... and improving in modifying the noun aim. Also, with the aim... improve can easily be construed as referring to the Baldrick Manufacturing Company and so does not refer unequivocally to policy.

    这个解释里确实说道with短语会修饰句子的主语

    10#
    发表于 2005-5-22 19:57:00 | 只看该作者

    A: interactions that affect同位语准确地对interactions进行了描述

    B:将同位语改为伴随状语,distortion,且 with interactions affecting有修饰句子主语 an array之嫌

    C:atmosphere that affects严重改变句意;不仅将同位语抹去,而且加上一个限制性定从,把atmosphere的意思也改掉了

    D:同C;时态错误

    E:as可以这么用吗?

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    IESE MBA
    近期活动

    正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 12:42
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部