PREP2-114,有过讨论,但我觉得很浮于表面

114.
            (30375-!-item-!-188;#058&005280)

While Hans Holbein the Younger is most often identified with his English portraits, scholars have long been recognizing him as a superb draftsman and a remarkably versatile artist and who was fundamental in synthesizing the novelties of the Italian Renaissance with the rational tradition of Northern Europe.

(A) been recognizing him as a superb draftsman and a remarkably versatile artist and who
                不确定完成进行时的必要性,应该不需要; and who之前无平行部分

(B) been recognizing him for being a superb draftsman and a remarkably versatile artist and he recognize sth as sth结构使用错误,being必错;recognize的单复数错误

(C) recognized him as a superb draftsman and a remarkably versatile artist who who只能就近指代artist,我觉得没有表达逻辑意思

(D) recognized him as a superb draftsman and a remarkably versatile artist and he

(E) recognized him for being a superb draftsman and a remarkably versatile artist and who being错误,同B

我错了,看了答案以后很赞成C,who是隔着指代him,从was就可以判断出来

但问题在于,D为什么错呢?千万别说he指代不清,应该不会有这个问题

PREP笔记中说会run-on,我奇怪了, 完整句子and完整句子 这种结构怎么可能run-on呢?

没有说D 错，只是相比C, 觉得C 更好， 而且用AND连接的两个句子不是特别有并列性，主语都不一样，所以不是很顺口。

这里应该不是run-on, run-on是缺少连词

我觉得这里原句有用从句表达的意思而非并列句 在这个句子里用从句表达更清晰顺畅

D是不是可以归为从句变并列的错误

还有这种主语不一致的并列句 例如 A do B and C do D 是否需要改成 A do B, and C do D?

d中, and前加个都逗号就对了

楼上说的很有道理，不加逗号确实能引起这层歧义

但是加了逗号我也不觉的正确，主要是根据and后面的内容，读明白了能看出来是对前面两个称呼的进一步解释，用并列不合理