ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1830|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 6-16

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-6-5 20:54:00 | 只看该作者

GWD 6-16

Q16:

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

 

  1. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
  2. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also

答案选B但我认为选A. 虽然非倒装的情况下是没有it的,但倒装我任为应该有

沙发
发表于 2006-6-5 23:30:00 | 只看该作者

没有这个规定过啊,从来not only...but also...中就不能加其他东西。GG有没倒装加it的例句?

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-6-6 00:56:00 | 只看该作者

我前些天见过的,但暂时没有找到原题,所以不确定答案,等找到了一定写上来。

也请那位高手能给出确定的答案

地板
发表于 2006-6-6 01:13:00 | 只看该作者
A isn't correct.  You can rewrite the sentence as:

B) The
systematic clearing not only created farmland and gave houses but also caused erosion and deforested regions.
A)
The
systematic clearing not only created farmland and gave houses but it also caused erosion and deforested regions.



5#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-6-6 16:40:00 | 只看该作者

Thanks a lot !!!

6#
发表于 2006-8-8 14:56:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用yaoyao99在2006-6-6 1:13:00的发言:
A isn't correct.  You can rewrite the sentence as:

B) The
systematic clearing not only created farmland and gave houses but also caused erosion and deforested regions.
A)
The
systematic clearing not only created farmland and gave houses but it also caused erosion and deforested regions.



改写有问题。。。B

应该是The systematic clearing not only created farmland which gave houses but also caused erosion and deforested regions

我觉得这个题最大的问题是逻辑问题,并不是farmland gave houses and furniture,应该是 clearing forests

所以,我认为此题还是应该选A。。。

7#
发表于 2006-8-26 13:15:00 | 只看该作者

如果是A,gave 应改为GIVE(与CREATE一起倒装)

A应该不对。

要说逻辑意思,D也不错。

 D.     The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also

但是NN斑斑认为IT指代不清,这个毛病A 也有。

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=186225&replyID=&skin=1

所以B相对好一点。

“没有最好,只有更好”

但是NN斑斑认为IT指代不清,这个毛病A 也有。

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=186225&replyID=&skin=1

所以B相对好一点。

“没有最好,只有更好”

8#
发表于 2007-4-12 15:46:00 | 只看该作者
高人,A确实存在gave→GIVE,
实在不明白原句的意思gave的主语到底是谁,如果是s
ystematic clearing of forests ,则gave→Ggive,
总觉得B改变了原意,在非限定性定语从句中,which应该指代的逗号前面最近那个词即farmland,(要不which就要改为that,孙继军讲的)但是从逻辑上讲是很合理的。
D项最贴近原句意思,我倾向D
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-10 09:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部