問RC: PT12-S3-P3 Legal reason #16

pinsyuanwu · 发表于 2019-6-27 20:32:40

From the discussion of wills in the third paragraph it can be inferred that substantive arg. as to the validity of a will might be considerded under which one of the following circustances?Ans : A judge rules that the law can be interpreted to allow for a verbal witness to a will in a case involving a medical emergency

LSAT Powescore Forum explanation
the question asks about how substantive considerations might be applied to the admissibility of a will. Substantive considerations are contrasted with formal rules. In the example in the passage, formal rules are shown to invalidate a will because of the failure to meet witnessing requirements even though the person executing the will meant for the will to be respected. Therefore, I need an answer choice that shows me a judge would reach a different decision using substantive considerations. The opposite would be that this will without witnesses is still accepted even though it doesn't meet the formal requirement. I need a substantive reason why a judge might accept it.

但我看不出來為何( E ) not meet the formal requirement. (E)只是他的 requirement 是verbal witness

大神們能幫幫忙explain一下

p.s.鍵盤的m壞了只能中英夾雜了

問RC: PT12-S3-P3 Legal reason #16

所属分类: 法学院申请

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()