ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1728|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

12.10 清华考场报分

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-1-5 19:01:00 | 只看该作者

12.10 清华考场报分

 


Test Test Date Reading Listening Speaking Writing Total
TELXMLDecember 10, 200630 27 24 28 109
How to interpret scores?
 




Reading  Skills Level  Your Performance  
ReadingHigh(22-30)

Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did, typically understand academic texts in English that require a wide range of reading abilities regardless of the difficulty of the texts.

Test takers who score at the HIGH level, typically

  • have a very good command of academic vocabulary and grammatical structure;
  • can understand and connect information, make appropriate inferences, and synthesize ideas, even when the text is conceptually dense and the language is complex;
  • can recognize the expository organization of a text and the role that specific information serves within the larger text, even when the text is conceptually dense; and
  • can abstract major ideas from a text, even when the text is conceptually dense and contains complex language.
 
Listening  Skills Level  Your Performance  
ListeningHigh(22-30)

Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did, typically understand conversations and lectures in English that present a wide range of listening demands. These demands can include difficult vocabulary (uncommon terms, or colloquial or figurative language), complex grammatical structures, abstract or complex ideas, and/or making sense of unexpected or seemingly contradictory information.

When listening to lectures and conversations like these, test takers at the HIGH level typically can

  • understand main ideas and important details, whether they are stated or implied;
  • distinguish more important ideas from less important ones;
  • understand how information is being used (for example, to provide evidence for a claim or describe a step in a complex process);
  • recognize how pieces of information are connected (for example, in a cause-and-effect relationship);
  • understand many different ways that speakers use language for purposes other than to give information (for example, to emphasize a point, express agreement or disagreement, or convey intentions indirectly); and
  • synthesize information, even when it is not presented in sequence, and make correct inferences on the basis of that information.
 
Speaking  Skills Level  Your Performance  
Speaking about familiar topicsFair(2.5 - 3.0)

Your responses indicate you are able to speak in English about your personal experiences and opinions in a mostly clear and coherent manner. Your speech is mostly clear with only occasional errors. Grammar and vocabulary are somewhat limited and include some errors. At times, the limitations prevent you from elaborating fully on your ideas, but they do not seriously interfere with overall communication.

 
Speaking about campus situationsGood(3.5 - 4.0)

Your responses indicate an ability to speak effectively in English about reading material and conversations typically encountered by university students. Overall, your responses are clear and coherent, with only occasional errors of pronunciation, grammar, or vocabulary.

 
Speaking about academic course contentGood(3.5 - 4.0)

Your responses demonstrate an ability to communicate effectively in English about academic topics typical of first-year university studies. Your speech is mostly clear and fluent. You are able to use appropriate vocabulary and grammar to explain concepts and ideas from reading or lecture material. You are able to talk about key information and relevant details with only minor inaccuracies.

 
Writing  Skills Level  Your Performance  
Writing based on reading and listeningGood(4.0 - 5.0)

You responded well to the task, relating the lecture to the reading. Weaknesses, if you have any, might have to do with

  • slight imprecision in your summary of some of the main points and/or
  • use of English that is occasionally ungrammatical or unclear.
 
Writing based on knowledge and experienceGood(4.0 - 5.0)

You responded with a well-organized and developed essay. Weaknesses, if you have any, might have to do with

  • use of English that is occasionally ungrammatical, unclear, or unidiomatic and/or
  • elaboration of ideas or connection of ideas that could have been stronger.
 

 

考试的时候觉得口语没进入状态,支支吾吾的,果然得了个fair

不过后来的学术部分还行。阅读是没想到能得满分。谢谢CD,从这里学到了很多东西。
沙发
发表于 2007-1-5 19:11:00 | 只看该作者

牛 恭喜~这样的话……16号的也快出了?这分是从零点能有还是八点多啊?


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-1-5 19:11:00编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2007-1-5 20:12:00 | 只看该作者

貌似12月10号和以后考的,分数(包括单项口语分)都比11月份的要高啊。

地板
发表于 2007-1-5 20:35:00 | 只看该作者
希望楼主能给我们传几个你平时练时的口语答案,看看怎么样的口语才可以拿24分阿
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-1-5 22:32:00 | 只看该作者

口语实在是羞于启齿啊。平时用英语作presentation什么的,从来没惧过。和native speaker侃大山也能给忽悠了,结果一到考试对着机器就大脑短路。还好学术演讲的底子比较扎实,在后边把分给拉回来一些。

所以建议大家多掐时间对着电脑说,毕竟考试和聊天还是有很大不同的,一不留神时间就过去了。另外就是多练学术段子。能拿的分坚决拿下!

6#
发表于 2007-1-5 23:05:00 | 只看该作者
很不错的成绩,几乎所有学校应该都可以申请了。楼主方便的话介绍下复习经验吧。
7#
发表于 2007-1-6 19:30:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用elefaint在2007-1-5 22:32:00的发言:

口语实在是羞于启齿啊。平时用英语作presentation什么的,从来没惧过。和native speaker侃大山也能给忽悠了,结果一到考试对着机器就大脑短路。还好学术演讲的底子比较扎实,在后边把分给拉回来一些。

所以建议大家多掐时间对着电脑说,毕竟考试和聊天还是有很大不同的,一不留神时间就过去了。另外就是多练学术段子。能拿的分坚决拿下!

恩……同意。对电脑说太没感觉,平时练习时准备时间卡得不严是很不好的……

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-14 20:57
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部