ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 967|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 16-31, 没找到

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-4-29 14:57:00 | 只看该作者

GWD 16-31, 没找到

Q31:

Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

 

  1. Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

  2. Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

  3. Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886and outnumbering

  4. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering

  5. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

   Answer: E

为什么不选A

沙发
发表于 2007-4-29 17:17:00 | 只看该作者

A的outnumbering指代不清.

A的意思是1886 outnumber emily寫給任何人的信,但句子的正確意思是 emily寫給susan的信outnumber他寫給任何人的都多.

 

板凳
发表于 2007-4-30 20:05:00 | 只看该作者

A和E表达的意思不同,尽管语法都对。

但是怎么能从划线句子推断原句正确的意思呢?

而且E的which were可以省略,也不够简洁啊?

感觉上E的结构比较好,但是无法说A有什么错。

地板
发表于 2007-4-30 22:23:00 | 只看该作者

同意ls

当时我选了A,因为原句如果不存在逻辑问题,谓语一般不改成修饰成分,修饰成分也一般不改成谓语

5#
发表于 2007-8-29 14:39:00 | 只看该作者

E中有两个问题,第一是“,which”,反正是GMAT极度不喜欢的用法,特别是逗号前的词还不是which的先行词。第二,outnumber是不是应该用过去式?

A中的outnumbering逻辑主语是句子主语,和1886没有什么关系。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 06:19
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部