ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

The gyrfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close brush with extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970's.

正确答案: A

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 5940|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og 251 关于fivefold

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-30 11:02:00 | 只看该作者

og 251 关于fivefold

251. The gyrfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close brush with extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970’s.



(A) extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than



(B) extinction; its numbers are now five times more than



(C) extinction, their numbers now fivefold what they were



(D) extinction, now with fivefold the numbers they hadA



(E) extinction, now with numbers five times greater than



A, the best choice, uses a singular pronoun, its, to refer to the singular antecedent The gyrfalcon, and it properly uses the construction its numbers are now... greater than. In B, the construction its numbers are... more is not idiomatic: there are more birds, but not more numbers. Choices C and D use a plural pronoun, their or they, to refer to a grammatically singular antecedent, The gyrfalcon. Choices D and E wrongly use a phrase introduced by now with to modify The gyrfalcon. In both choices, the phrase confusingly seems to parallel with extinction; a new clause with a present tense verb is needed to state what the gyrfalcon’s numbers are now.



看了前面的帖子,都是关于number的。


我的问题是:C、D中的fivefold(adj., adv.)用法是否不正确?


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-6 12:38:06编辑过]
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-5 13:07:00 | 只看该作者
up
板凳
发表于 2005-1-5 21:55:00 | 只看该作者

ETS这里没有讲, 我想应该不必深究. fivefold到底对不对, 很难讲. 换一道题, 可能有fivefold就是对的.

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-6 12:43:00 | 只看该作者

their numbers now fivefold what they were:此处fivefold带宾语what,类似double (what they were)的用法,但是,词典中fivefold不能做verb,所以肯定是错误的。


now with fivefold the numbers they had: fivefold 如果理解成adv.倒也说的过去。


不知大家可赞同?


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-6 12:44:26编辑过]
5#
发表于 2005-1-6 16:07:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用winnie在2005-1-6 12:43:00的发言:now with fivefold the numbers they had: fivefold 如果理解成adv.倒也说的过去。不知大家可赞同?

如果是副词,位置也不对呀

而且,如果是副词的话,修饰HAD,也觉得不妥

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-6 17:37:00 | 只看该作者
with+句子(the numbers they had),fivefold夹在中间,什么也不是?呵呵。
7#
发表于 2005-8-22 16:50:00 | 只看该作者

Although fivefold is not verb, CDE are still Run-on sentences right??


thanks!

8#
发表于 2005-9-6 19:45:00 | 只看该作者

up up~~


now i am very sure C is run-on sentence (fivefold used as verb here)


but how about D and E??


in D) extinction, now with fivefold the numbers they had when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970's  


WITH 的感觉好像是拿来形容前面的extinction,不造成流水句, 但是HAD 又是动词啊?


in E) extinction, now with numbers five times greater than when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970's 这句好像不是流水句??

9#
发表于 2005-9-14 10:44:00 | 只看该作者
老大,什么是流水句?
10#
发表于 2005-9-22 15:31:00 | 只看该作者

run-on sentence~ so can u help solve my questions? do you think those are Run-on?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-13 07:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部