ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5868|回复: 17
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG184,OG114,逗号的补出问题.

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-3-26 14:31:00 | 只看该作者

OG184,OG114,逗号的补出问题.

114. From the bark of the paper birch tree the Menomini crafted a canoe about twenty feet long and two feet wide, with small ribs and rails of cedar, which could carry four persons or eight hundred pounds of baggage so light that a person could easily portage it around impeding rapids.



(A)  baggage so light



(B)   baggage being so light



(C)  baggage, yet being so light



(D)  baggage, and so light



(E)   baggage yet was so light   正确答案是E



184. As measured by the Commerce Department,



corporate profits peaked in the fourth quarter of 1988 and have slipped since then, as many companies have been unable to pass on higher



(A)  and have slipped since then, as many companies have been unable to pass on higher costs



(B)  and have slipped since then, the reason being because many companies have been unable to pass on higher costs



(C)  and slipped since then, many companies being unable to pass on higher costs



(D)  but, many companies unable to pass on higher costs, they have slipped since then



(E)   yet are slipping since then, because many companies were unable to pass on higher costs



A, the best choice, observes an appropriate sequence of verb tenses_ a single act in the past (peaked) followed by an extended activity reaching to the present (have slipped). The as clause states clearly the cause of the slippage. B suffers from the redundant and unidiomatic expression the reason being because. In C, the use of the simple past slipped with since then is unidiomatic because since then denotes extended time. In D, the intrusion of the awkward many ... costs causes the antecedent of they to become unclear. Further­more, a comma should precede the but since it introduces a second independent clause. In E, yet also requires a comma before it, are slipping with since then is illogical, and were unable represents an ungrammatical tense shift.




同样都是引出一个主语相同的分句,114就不用逗号,184就要(D加逗号还勉强可以理解,因为后面有一个插入语,但是E就不能理解了).


为什么啊?请教了!


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-3-29 22:59:06编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2005-3-26 23:12:00 | 只看该作者
up
板凳
发表于 2005-3-28 02:06:00 | 只看该作者
大家帮忙看一下!谢谢!
地板
发表于 2005-3-29 06:48:00 | 只看该作者
help!
5#
发表于 2005-3-29 09:08:00 | 只看该作者

184的逗号是否必要我不知道, 但114的逗号是一定不该有的.


把114的从句简化就是:a canoe could carry.........yet was so light...............yet 前后是同一个主语, 所以不该有逗好.


举个例子: I came here early but still missed the show 就不该有逗号, 对吧?


184的情况比较少见, 当原因状语从句在后面的时候一般不该有逗号. 比如: I can't go there because it's too late. 我们就不会在because前加逗号. 但有了逗号, 在我看来, 使句子理解起来更容易, 而且也不影响解题.



麻烦楼主将字体变成4号, 并且不要加粗, 好吗? 谢了. 看得我头晕.


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-3-29 9:09:53编辑过]
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-29 23:03:00 | 只看该作者

楼上的MM,抱歉,字号已经改过了.

184OG里面说的还是挺明确要加逗号,这是为什么啊?!

相当的不理解?!

请教大家!

7#
发表于 2005-3-30 02:03:00 | 只看该作者

对不起, 我在回上一个贴子的时候没看清你的意思.

这也成了我的问题. 一样是yet, 一样是同一个主语, 为何逗号的用法会有分歧呢?

请高人指教!!!

8#
发表于 2005-3-30 15:42:00 | 只看该作者
顶!究竟是怎么会是啊!?
9#
发表于 2005-3-30 16:18:00 | 只看该作者
顶!不明白的说
10#
发表于 2005-3-31 21:32:00 | 只看该作者

再顶一次!

大家看看是为什么啊?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 06:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部