ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 971|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT6-2-2选项解释~

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-5-6 19:01:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT6-2-2选项解释~

Physiological research has uncovered disturbing evidence linking a number of structural disorders to jogging. Among the ailments seemingly connected with this now-popular sport are spinal disk displacements, stress fractures of the feet and ankles, knee and hip joint deterioration, and tendonitis. Furthermore, these injuries do not occur exclusively among beginning runners—veteran joggers suffer an equal percentage of injuries. What the accumulating data suggest is that the human anatomy is not able to withstand the stresses of jogging.

Which one of the following is an assumption of the argument?

(A) The link between jogging and certain structural disorders appears to be a causal one.

(B) Jogging causes more serious disorders than other sports.

(C) The jogger’s level of experience is a factor determining the likelihood of a jogging injury.

(D) Some sports are safer for the human body than jogging.A

(E) The human species is not very durable.

 

答案我还是选对了~但是不懂得A的意思~~可以请求帮忙翻译一下吗?

沙发
发表于 2007-5-8 02:50:00 | 只看该作者
A: jogging and certain structural disorders两者间是因果关系。


板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-5-8 20:54:00 | 只看该作者
啊!原来如此……a  causal  link 原来是因果关系啊……嘿嘿……谢谢icewarm~~
地板
发表于 2007-5-11 05:54:00 | 只看该作者

The conclusion of this argument is: human anatomy is not able to withstand the stresses

of jogging.

 

The link between jogging and certain structural disorders appears to be a causal one.

If you negate it: The link between jogging and certain structural disorders appears to be

not a causal one. This negation weaken the conclusion, so it is the assumption of this

argument.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-25 10:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部