请大牛来看一下，两个同位语之间不用and连接一下吗？

hlhlhlt · 发表于 2013-1-7 20:32:18

190.The thirteen original British colonies in North America, some formed as commercial ventures, others as religious havens, each had a written charter that set forth its form of government and the rights of the colonists.

A.some formed as commercial ventures, others as religious havens, each had a written charter

B.some being formed as a commercial venture, others as religious havens, all of which had written charters

C.some that formed as commercial ventures, others as religious havens, all had written charters

D.with some being formed as a commercial venture, others as religious havens, all had a written charter(A)

E.with some formed as commercial ventures, while others as religious havens, each had a written charter

题目释义：The thirteen…., some…, others…, each…

考点：1.独立主格，表示伴随，所以必须修饰主谓宾结构，而非主系表结构。

独立主格三种形式：

1)一般形式（独立部分与主句部分无太多关联）n.+n.，n.+V-ed/v-ing，n.+介词短语/形容词短语

2)with形式（与主句主语有紧密的逻辑关系）：with+宾语+宾补，如：with+n.+v-ed/v-ing/介词短语/形容词短语

3)each形式（必须前面有复数名词）： each+v-ed/v-ing，each+介词短语/形容词短语，each+n.+介词短语

*：with型独立主格在GMAT中常常被判累赘。

2.固定搭配some…others

3.set forth阐明, 宣布, 提出, 陈列, 出发

选项分析：A.Correct；some formed as commercial ventures, others as religious havens做为the thirteen original British colonies in North America的同位语，each为the thirteen original British colonies的同位语

B.Being多余；all与后面的its 单复形式不统一；全句缺少谓语动词

C.some that formed结构中some在定语从句中做主语，主动行使form动作错误；all与后面的its 单复形式不统一

D.with的存在使得some并不是指代colonies，而是与colonies相关的东西；all与后面的its单复形式不统一；这里with并没有夹心修饰的歧义，因为all/each和colonies是同一样东西，所以向前向后修饰逻辑上都一样（夹心修饰见prep 1-207补充说明）。

E.with的存在使得some不是指代colonies，而是与colonies相关的东西；while多余，因为后面的others as religious havens中没有谓语动词，while必须省(如果有谓语动词则不能省，如Some cleaned the windows, while others mopped the floor)。

hlhlhlt · 发表于 2013-1-7 20:33:44

这道题中选项分析我highlight的部分，既然others和each都是同位语，难道不应该用and连接一下吗？谢谢！！

hlhlhlt · 发表于 2013-1-7 20:44:30

还有E中with这个同位语结构虽然做过很多这样的题，但是大多掐时间做过于机械，往往忽视with独立性主格结构中with是有含义的，唉，逻辑为王啊！！写给自己！

DUKB24 · 发表于 2013-1-7 21:03:24

special usage？should be remembered？

我记得manhattan的RON是这样解释的？我不太肯定= =

可以去google一下看看

我当时这里也小纠结了一下

hlhlhlt · 发表于 2013-1-7 22:22:06

special usage？should be remembered？

我记得manhattan的RON是这样解释的？我不太肯定= =

可以去google一下看看

我当时这里也小纠结了一下

-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2013/1/7 21:03:24)

hello，好久不见~~~special usage？should be remembered？什么意思？

DUKB24 · 发表于 2013-1-7 22:58:14

special usage？should be remembered？

我记得manhattan的RON是这样解释的？我不太肯定= =

可以去google一下看看

我当时这里也小纠结了一下

-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2013/1/7 21:03:24)

hello，好久不见~~~special usage？should be remembered？什么意思？

-- by 会员 hlhlhlt (2013/1/7 22:22:06)

貌似manhattan的解释说的是这里的正确答案挺特别的？我忘了诶= =不太记得

的确好久了

考完T又是期末的被虐惨了

又开始G了噢？

加油

patrizioren · 发表于 2013-1-7 23:48:33

The thirteen original British colonies in North America, some formed as commercial ventures, others as religious havens, each had a written charter that set forth its form of government and the rights of the colonists.
不瞒楼主，同位语的具体含义我一直都不清楚。。。
但是，我认为，本句的主干是：
13 colonies each had a written....
主语和动词之间的some formed as commercial ventures, others as religious havens部分，正如句子的标点符号所示，被逗号隔开，可以不算做句子成分。
既然如此，如果在each之前加一个and，这个and一定是连接两个逻辑上并列的东西，由此看来似不妥。。

DUKB24 · 发表于 2013-1-7 23:51:45

The thirteen original British colonies in North America, some formed as commercial ventures, others as religious havens, each had a written charter that set forth its form of government and the rights of the colonists.
不瞒楼主，同位语的具体含义我一直都不清楚。。。
但是，我认为，本句的主干是：
13 colonies each had a written....
主语和动词之间的some formed as commercial ventures, others as religious havens部分，正如句子的标点符号所示，被逗号隔开，可以不算做句子成分。
既然如此，如果在each之前加一个and，这个and一定是连接两个逻辑上并列的东西，由此看来似不妥。。

-- by 会员 patrizioren (2013/1/7 23:48:33)

她的意思是在others前面加个and吧= =

patrizioren · 发表于 2013-1-8 00:05:28

这道题中选项分析我highlight的部分，既然others和each都是同位语，难道不应该用and连接一下吗？谢谢！！

-- by 会员 hlhlhlt (2013/1/7 20:33:44)

请问lz是指在哪儿加and呢？刚刚可能没搞清意思，sorry~

sisichen666 · 发表于 2013-1-8 01:04:51

中间的some.....others当做是插入语，就不会和each有干扰呀。。。。。。亲

本贴相关题目 GMATPrep-2008E1-SC-190 (ATXR)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

请大牛来看一下，两个同位语之间不用and连接一下吗？

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()