OG13 SC16 求点拨有谢哦

xxu7 · 发表于 2012-11-24 21:20:21

16. A surge in new home sales and a drop in weekly unemployment claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought.

(A) claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought

(B) claims suggests that the economy might not be so weak as some analysts have previously thought

(C) claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as have been previously thought by some analysts

(D) claims, suggesting about the economy that it might not be so weak as previously thought by some analysts

(E) claims, suggesting the economy might not be as weak as previously thought to be by some analysts

这个题答案A，只有一个问题，as...as不是要前后对称吗？这里A没有对称，是不是应该这样补出呢
claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as （the economy that） some analysts previously thought
但是这样补出好像也不对，晕死了，求高手解答！
为了报答大家，发个OG12 OG13 PS-DS-RC-CR-SC 所有部分比较及题号对应表互相帮助。。。。

flonacui · 发表于 2012-11-24 22:45:59

比较结构如果主语相同可以省略主语简洁

yiqing2012 · 发表于 2012-11-24 23:01:03

摘抄一下superbat版主关于这里的总结：than usual/ ever before/ previously expected/previously estimated/ anticipated…等
?注意：这些词，并不要求比较对象前后的平行，并不需要第一个比较对象出现状语。
Q113 Analysts blamed May’s sluggish retail sales on unexciting merchandise as well as the weather, which was colder and wetter than usual in some regions, slowing sales of barbecue grills and lawn furniture.
Q531 New techniques in thermal-scanning photography, a process that records radiation from surface areas, have made it possible to study in greater detail than ever before the effects of calefaction, or warming, of a river.

TerraceHo · 发表于 2012-11-24 23:22:54

如果要補的話，我覺得是這樣的：
the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought that the economy might be...

由於parallel maker前面部份的主謂與that-clause的主謂相同，在不造成ambiguity的前提下將相同的主謂省略，就變成了答案那樣了。

【下面的是俺的疑問，希望有idea的童鞋多多回覆!!】
上面的that-clause可以用what來替代（我記得不知道在哪裡看過說what可以用來指代句子），所以，上句也可以變成：
the economy might not be as weak as what some analysts previously thought.

不知道俺這樣的想法是否正確，歡迎attack!!
謝！~

jeffjarrett · 发表于 2012-11-25 06:53:55

如果要補的話，我覺得是這樣的：
the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought that the economy might be...

由於parallel maker前面部份的主謂與that-clause的主謂相同，在不造成ambiguity的前提下將相同的主謂省略，就變成了答案那樣了。

【下面的是俺的疑問，希望有idea的童鞋多多回覆!!】
上面的that-clause可以用what來替代（我記得不知道在哪裡看過說what可以用來指代句子），所以，上句也可以變成：
the economy might not be as weak as what some analysts previously thought.

不知道俺這樣的想法是否正確，歡迎attack!!
謝！~

-- by 会员 TerraceHo (2012/11/24 23:22:54)

问题是可以不加what反而更清楚直观的情况下为何还要画蛇添足加一个what呢？意义是三小? ，“史泰龙擅长杀人和放火”这句话非要说成“史泰龙擅长杀人和史泰龙擅长放火”是不是就有点神经质了？

xxu7 · 发表于 2012-11-25 09:51:47

如果要補的話，我覺得是這樣的：
the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought that the economy might be...

由於parallel maker前面部份的主謂與that-clause的主謂相同，在不造成ambiguity的前提下將相同的主謂省略，就變成了答案那樣了。

【下面的是俺的疑問，希望有idea的童鞋多多回覆!!】
上面的that-clause可以用what來替代（我記得不知道在哪裡看過說what可以用來指代句子），所以，上句也可以變成：
the economy might not be as weak as what some analysts previously thought.

不知道俺這樣的想法是否正確，歡迎attack!!
謝！~

-- by 会员 TerraceHo (2012/11/24 23:22:54)

the economy might not bethought by some analysts as weak as some analysts previously thought that the economy might be...

jeffjarrett · 发表于 2012-11-25 11:39:08

如果要補的話，我覺得是這樣的：
the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought that the economy might be...

由於parallel maker前面部份的主謂與that-clause的主謂相同，在不造成ambiguity的前提下將相同的主謂省略，就變成了答案那樣了。

【下面的是俺的疑問，希望有idea的童鞋多多回覆!!】
上面的that-clause可以用what來替代（我記得不知道在哪裡看過說what可以用來指代句子），所以，上句也可以變成：
the economy might not be as weak as what some analysts previously thought.

不知道俺這樣的想法是否正確，歡迎attack!!
謝！~

-- by 会员 TerraceHo (2012/11/24 23:22:54)

the economy might not bethought by some analysts as weak as some analysts previously thought that the economy might be...

-- by 会员 xxu7 (2012/11/25 9:51:47)

哈哈，你这句话碉堡了

yiqing2012 · 发表于 2012-11-25 13:50:37

如果要補的話，我覺得是這樣的：
the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought that the economy might be...

由於parallel maker前面部份的主謂與that-clause的主謂相同，在不造成ambiguity的前提下將相同的主謂省略，就變成了答案那樣了。

【下面的是俺的疑問，希望有idea的童鞋多多回覆!!】
上面的that-clause可以用what來替代（我記得不知道在哪裡看過說what可以用來指代句子），所以，上句也可以變成：
the economy might not be as weak as what some analysts previously thought.

不知道俺這樣的想法是否正確，歡迎attack!!
謝！~

-- by 会员 TerraceHo (2012/11/24 23:22:54)

问题是可以不加what反而更清楚直观的情况下为何还要画蛇添足加一个what呢？意义是三小? ，“史泰龙擅长杀人和放火”这句话非要说成“史泰龙擅长杀人和史泰龙擅长放火”是不是就有点神经质了？

-- by 会员 jeffjarrett (2012/11/25 6:53:55)

这里没有一定要省略或者不省略的~，两种都对：Even though more money was removed out of stock funds in July as in any month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as an industry trade group had previously estimated.

A. as in any month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as
B. as had been in any other month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as what
C. than there was in any other month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as that which
D. than in any month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as
E. than in any other month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as what
OA:E

abjure · 发表于 2012-11-25 17:50:12

如果要補的話，我覺得是這樣的：
the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought that the economy might be...

由於parallel maker前面部份的主謂與that-clause的主謂相同，在不造成ambiguity的前提下將相同的主謂省略，就變成了答案那樣了。

【下面的是俺的疑問，希望有idea的童鞋多多回覆!!】
上面的that-clause可以用what來替代（我記得不知道在哪裡看過說what可以用來指代句子），所以，上句也可以變成：
the economy might not be as weak as what some analysts previously thought.

不知道俺這樣的想法是否正確，歡迎attack!!
謝！~

-- by 会员 TerraceHo (2012/11/24 23:22:54)

问题是可以不加what反而更清楚直观的情况下为何还要画蛇添足加一个what呢？意义是三小? ，“史泰龙擅长杀人和放火”这句话非要说成“史泰龙擅长杀人和史泰龙擅长放火”是不是就有点神经质了？

-- by 会员 jeffjarrett (2012/11/25 6:53:55)

这里没有一定要省略或者不省略的~，两种都对：Even though more money was removed out of stock funds in July as in any month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as an industry trade group had previously estimated.

A. as in any month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as
B. as had been in any other month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as what
C. than there was in any other month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as that which
D. than in any month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as
E. than in any other month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as what
OA:E

-- by 会员 yiqing2012 (2012/11/25 13:50:37)

Even though more money was removed out of stock funds in July as in any month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as an industry trade group had previously estimated.

这题我觉得E不对，应该选D

yiqing2012 · 发表于 2012-11-25 18:42:19

如果要補的話，我覺得是這樣的：
the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought that the economy might be...

由於parallel maker前面部份的主謂與that-clause的主謂相同，在不造成ambiguity的前提下將相同的主謂省略，就變成了答案那樣了。

【下面的是俺的疑問，希望有idea的童鞋多多回覆!!】
上面的that-clause可以用what來替代（我記得不知道在哪裡看過說what可以用來指代句子），所以，上句也可以變成：
the economy might not be as weak as what some analysts previously thought.

不知道俺這樣的想法是否正確，歡迎attack!!
謝！~

-- by 会员 TerraceHo (2012/11/24 23:22:54)

问题是可以不加what反而更清楚直观的情况下为何还要画蛇添足加一个what呢？意义是三小? ，“史泰龙擅长杀人和放火”这句话非要说成“史泰龙擅长杀人和史泰龙擅长放火”是不是就有点神经质了？

-- by 会员 jeffjarrett (2012/11/25 6:53:55)

这里没有一定要省略或者不省略的~，两种都对：Even though more money was removed out of stock funds in July as in any month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as an industry trade group had previously estimated.

A. as in any month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as
B. as had been in any other month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as what
C. than there was in any other month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as that which
D. than in any month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as
E. than in any other month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as what
OA:E

-- by 会员 yiqing2012 (2012/11/25 13:50:37)

Even though more money was removed out of stock funds in July as in any month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as an industry trade group had previously estimated.

这题我觉得E不对，应该选D

-- by 会员 abjure (2012/11/25 17:50:12)

D中any后面应该有other哦~~

OG13 SC16 求点拨有谢哦

本帖子中包含更多资源

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块

OG13 SC16 求点拨 有谢哦

本帖子中包含更多资源

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块

OG13 SC16 求点拨有谢哦