ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 16702|回复: 29
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og127关于修饰对象的问题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-9-2 03:27:00 | 只看该作者

og127关于修饰对象的问题

127. In theory, international civil servants at the United Nations are prohibited from continuing to draw salaries
from their own governments; in practice, however, some governments merely substitute living allowances
for their employees' paychecks. assigned by them to the United Nations.
(A) for their employees' paychecks, assigned by them
(B) for the paychecks of their employees who have been assigned(B)
(C) for the paychecks of their employees, having been assigned
(D) in place of their employees' paychecks, for those of them assigned
(E) in place of the paychecks of their employees to have been assigned by them


我的问题是a答案还有c答案,黄色部分,是一个语法现象么?


og解释说a中修饰最近的名词paychecks,c怎么就修饰不明确了呢?


请指点,谢谢!

沙发
发表于 2004-9-2 21:14:00 | 只看该作者

C有个天大的错误哦~

现在分词作定语时表示的动作的发生时间要与谓语动词的时态大体一致~

现在分词的完成时是不能用于作限定词的!

就是说N.+having done 这样修饰是绝对错的~

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-9-3 00:27:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢,记住了

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-9-3 01:04:00 | 只看该作者
但是我还想肯定一点:是不是类似于a黄色部分这种结构的修饰成分都是修饰其前面紧跟的名词的啊?能不能用专业点的术语表达一下啊?
5#
发表于 2004-12-3 11:28:00 | 只看该作者
up
6#
发表于 2004-12-3 12:44:00 | 只看该作者
同问!
7#
发表于 2004-12-3 21:55:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用shiningstar在2004-9-2 3:27:00的发言:

127. In theory, international civil servants at the United Nations are prohibited from continuing to draw salaries
from their own governments; in practice, however, some governments merely substitute living allowances
for their employees' paychecks. assigned by them to the United Nations.
(A) for their employees' paychecks, assigned by them
(B) for the paychecks of their employees who have been assigned(B)
(C) for the paychecks of their employees, having been assigned
(D) in place of their employees' paychecks, for those of them assigned
(E) in place of the paychecks of their employees to have been assigned by them


我的问题是a答案还有c答案,黄色部分,是一个语法现象么?


og解释说a中修饰最近的名词paychecks,c怎么就修饰不明确了呢?


请指点,谢谢!


assigned by 和  having been assigned 是 分词短语作同位语,要求其逻辑主语要明确,即谁是动作的发出者要清晰。

A. assigned by 之前的名词是 paychecks, 也有可能是主句主语governments, 但其意思解释不通,所以还是应该修饰 paychecks.

C. having been assigned 之前的名词有 employees 和 paychecks, 而且二者都可以被assigned by the government, 所以有修饰不清晰的嫌疑。

8#
发表于 2004-12-3 23:21:00 | 只看该作者

白勇的《GMAT语法全解》上说:现在分词短语在句尾:(1)表伴随动作、状态、功能,与句子谓语动作同时发生,逻辑主语等与句子主语;(2)表伴随结果,整个句子是原因,导致分词动作产生,无逻辑主语

C中显然是第(1)种情况,having been assigned修饰some governments,不合理

9#
发表于 2005-4-15 17:13:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用shiningstar在2004-9-2 3:27:00的发言:

127. In theory, international civil servants at the United Nations are prohibited from continuing to draw salaries
from their own governments; in practice, however, some governments merely substitute living allowances
for their employees' paychecks. assigned by them to the United Nations.
(A) for their employees' paychecks, assigned by them
(B) for the paychecks of their employees who have been assigned(B)
(C) for the paychecks of their employees, having been assigned
(D) in place of their employees' paychecks, for those of them assigned
(E) in place of the paychecks of their employees to have been assigned by them


我的问题是a答案还有c答案,黄色部分,是一个语法现象么?


og解释说a中修饰最近的名词paychecks,c怎么就修饰不明确了呢?


请指点,谢谢!



A中的assigned by them ,是否有指代allowances的嫌疑??


可是og并没有说到???


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-4-15 17:14:11编辑过]
10#
发表于 2005-4-16 09:26:00 | 只看该作者

只要知道这里有指代歧义就好了.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 20:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部