og127关于修饰对象的问题

lazyinbed

以下是引用unique_seven在2008-7-22 20:05:00的发言：
253. Analysts blamed May's sluggish retail sales on unexciting merchandise as well as the weather, colder and wetter than was usual in some regions. which slowed sales of barbecue grills and lawn furniture.
 

(A)  colder and wetter than was usual in some regions, which slowed

(B)  which was colder and wetter than usual in some regions, slowing

(C)  since it was colder and wetter than usually in some regions, which slowed

(D)  being colder and wetter than usually in some
   regions, slowing

(E)   having been colder and wetter than was usual
   in some regions and slowed

 

这里slowing……可不可以理解成which（the weather） was colder and wetter than usual in some regions的伴随结果，还是做句子的伴随结果，所以前面NN总结的依然正确。菜鸟解释，大家指正。。。

恩,同意,这里的slowing....是作为which was colder and wetter than usual in some regions 伴随结果和前面的主句或者名词反而没有关系了,是不是可以这么理解现在分词在句尾就是作为前面一个句子伴随状语或者伴随结果,这个句子既可以是主句也可以是从句

不管怎么说tigercaiqun的总结实在是太牛了,胜过我做50道语法题,以前概念还是比较模糊的,这下豁然开朗了,牛

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-12-15 6:06:07编辑过]

piaolf123

赞tigercaiqun

lzj1209

tigercaiqunMM的总结真是太受用了~~~THX~~~~~~

情未浓

tigercaiqun总结的太好了！！！！！
我之前就是有逗号的修饰很混乱。。

逆水潜龙

看一好贴，胜做百题应该就是这感觉了吧·

逆水潜龙

当过去分词在句末时，不管有无逗号，都是就近修饰名词;
发现0G12  5上那个，surpassed by是个例外，修饰主语Diabets。非就近修饰death。慎用·

情未浓

当过去分词在句末时，不管有无逗号，都是就近修饰名词;
发现0G12  5上那个，surpassed by是个例外，修饰主语Diabets。非就近修饰death。慎用·

-- by 会员 逆水潜龙 (2011/11/21 4:08:20)

我觉得这一题用以上原则还是说得通的啊。
OG-5题正确句子：
Diabetes, together with its serious complications, ranks as the nation's third leading cause of death, surpassed only by heart disease and cancer.
这里diabetes实际上就是the nation's third leading cause of death.
所以surpassed修饰the nation's third leading cause of death，逻辑上也是正确的。

alexcui31707

chasedream 上的都是牛人，谢谢

AnnieFFish

这两天被v-ing & v-ed % 有没有逗号 这几个问题虐得天旋地转。。。。
每次以为自己终于知道了 又会有新的题目新的规则出现。。。看国外的论坛一个问题能看一个小时，然后一个帖子又引申出N个帖子，真是要跪的节奏
看了T大神的总结 真是豁然开朗！！！
谢谢大神

qtmdgmat

我有个问题不是说同一个句子里面的代词只能指代一个事物吗？ 为什么分句前的their 和后面their 指代不同