128. New hardy varieties of rice show promise of producing high yields without the costly requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties.
(A) requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties
(B) requirements by earlier high-yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation
(C) requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high-yielding varieties
(D) application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation that was required by earlier high-yielding varieties
(E) irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer that were required by earlier high-yielding varieties
Choice E, the best answer, clearly and grammatically expresses the idea that two costly procedures, irrigation and the application of... fertilizer, were required by earlier high-yielding varieties of rice. In A, the placement of by earlier... varieties immediately after application of fertilizer suggests that the varieties applied the fertilizer. In B and D, the phrase application of... fertilizer and irrigation is ambiguous in meaning: it cannot be clearly determined whether applying fertilizer and irrigating are a single operation or two distinct operations. In C, only irrigation--not both irrigation and fertilization--is clearly associated with the earlier... varieties of rice.
219. While larger banks can afford to maintain their own data-processing operations, many smaller regional and community banks are finding that the cost associated with upgrading data-processing equipment and with the development and maintenance of new products and technical staff are prohibitive.
我不太明白of的用法到底是怎样的。
这里D的错误OG说是D里面的容易歧义。如果application是主语,后面用was,那这么解释:A)商业化肥和灌溉的应用,还是B)商业化肥的应用,和灌溉?所以有歧义的。
而仔细又看了一下这道题感觉E也有歧义“1 灌溉与商用化肥的应用were 2商务化肥的灌溉与应用 were“
我根据og128与og219总结of结构如下
(a and b) of c这种结构就只能是a,b共同属于c,即og128题的E是“商务化肥的灌溉与应用 were”而不是“ 灌溉与商用化肥的应用were ”
c of a and b,即可以理解为a与b的c,也可以理解为a的c与b,对么?
感觉还是迷糊~
就好象就象og219题( development and maintenance )of (new products and technical staff)
这里是不是有无数层歧义?如发展与新产品和技术员工的维护,新产品的发展与维护和技术员工等,当然这里可以用逻辑意思知道发展与维护和技术员工不对应,这样可以排除一些歧义。
麻烦NN指教~谢谢~
|