ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2513|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-22-20

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-6-2 12:40:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-22-20


    

Not only did the
systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially
in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture,
but it also
caused erosion and very
quickly deforested whole regions.


    

 


    
  1. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests
         in the
    United
           States
    create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers
         relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
  2. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests
         in the
    United
           States
    create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave
         consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
  3. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast)
         and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
  4. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast)
         and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it
         also
  5. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the
         Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture,
         but it


这题看上去象是要考not only... but also,但我看实际上不该用not only ... but also, 因为逻辑意思上讲不同. 前半部分说系统性的砍伐树木为人民带来的大量的可耕种农田地和便宜的家具和房屋造价,后面说那样却导致了水土流失和地区性的快速沙漠化...只用but also来转折好象比较好.所以我选D,而给出的答案是A. 各位怎么看.

沙发
发表于 2006-6-3 06:05:00 | 只看该作者

我怎么觉得是b,A中not only did...create...and gave ...2个动作时态不一致,gave 应为give,

请大家点评。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-6-6 12:13:00 | 只看该作者

A, B的逻辑都很难讲得通啊.
哪位NN能发表下意见?
地板
发表于 2006-6-6 12:47:00 | 只看该作者
Oh my God!  You gotta be kidding me that A is the right one.  Obviously out of the two effects systematic clearing create, one is positive and the other is negative.  Not only ...but also shouldn't even fit in...I would pick one between D and E.  But who knows maybe there is some catch here that's against common sense.  I'll try to do some research on this...still in shock ... ~_~
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-6-6 13:12:00 | 只看该作者
hehe, GWD is all about shock. I hope the answer to this one is printed wrong. I picked D.

NN们出来鉴定一下吧please!
6#
发表于 2006-6-6 14:09:00 | 只看该作者

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

 A.Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
 

用了点倒装,外加not noly 。。。。but also 解释:既。。。又

did前置倒装,由于之前的not only中带入了主语【the systematic clearing of forests】,而后面是逗号,我觉的it加入还是可以接受的。但是我倾向于没有逗号,去掉it

B.Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
 

这里的which修饰farmland,意思不对,农场给么消费者相对不贵的房子和家具。

C.The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
 

前面没有not only。not only。。。。but also一定是成双出现的

D.The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
 

前面没有not only。not only。。。。but also一定是成双出现的

E.The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it

but it不对,必须是but also。另外,分词在当中修饰,不好


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-6-6 14:15:52编辑过]
7#
发表于 2006-6-6 14:14:00 | 只看该作者

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

还原一下

The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

系统的砍伐森林既创建了农场同时给消费者提高了相对便宜的房子和家具又导致了整个地区的水土流失和整个地区的快速沙化

8#
发表于 2006-6-6 14:14:00 | 只看该作者

这题应该就是考

not only 。。。but also


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-6-6 14:16:27编辑过]
9#
发表于 2006-7-2 15:38:00 | 只看该作者
`
10#
发表于 2006-7-2 15:42:00 | 只看该作者

问一下but also中间可以加成份吗,怎么感觉A读起来很别扭,所以我选B了。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 12:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部