GWD-22-20

winniebear0202

又细想了一下，语法中好像有种错误是改变原文结构，比如把并列改成主从，原文A两个动作create  and gave 是并列，而在B中gave成了修饰的成份了，这么理解对不对呢？

zhaoyak7

我觉得这样理解没有问题，就算A不全对，至少也是effectiveness

hedge

gonghao说的在理,可是我老觉得A中的it指代有问题,前面出现过这么多个单数名词,用it就比较麻烦了

B. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also  您提到"这里的which修饰farmland，意思不对，农场给消费者相对不贵的房子和家具。"

从意思上看也未必不可,即

从意思上看也未必不可,即

农场土地(生产资料)使得消费者获得了相对便宜的房子和家具 , 个人认为which指代没有问题.

从帖子  http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&replyID=1669326&id=176512&skin=0 来看,

GWD6-Q16与GWD22-20:答案有出入

GWD6-Q16与GWD22-20:答案有出入

从帖子  http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&replyID=1669326&id=176512&skin=0 来看,

GWD6-Q16与GWD22-20:答案有出入

GWD6-Q16与GWD22-20:答案有出入

GWD6-Q16与GWD22-20:答案有出入

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-12-16 17:03:05编辑过]

missgmat

I choose B at first, but right now, I agree A.

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.