阅读36套里的一道逻辑题求解

Helencats · 发表于 2013-8-10 16:43:48

阅读36套section7第6题
The use of heat pumps has been held back
largely by skepticism about advertisers ‘ claims that
heat pumps can provide as many as two units of
thermal energy for each unit of electrical energy
used, thus apparently contradicting the principle of
energy conservation.                      (43 words)

6. If the author ‘s assessment of the use of heat pumps is correct, which of the following best expresses the lesson that advertisers should learn from this case?
(A) Do not make exaggerated claims about the products you are trying to promote.
(B) Focus your advertising campaign on vague analogies and veiled implications instead of on facts.
(C) Do not use facts in your advertising that will strain the prospective client‘s ability to believe.
(D) Do not assume in your advertising that the prospective clients know even the most elementary scientific principles.
(E) Concentrate your advertising firmly on financially relevant issues such as price discounts and efficiency of operation.

答案是C，我看来看去也觉得A挺对的，网上各种讲解都不是特别清楚明白，求高手解答！谢谢~~~

璐璐爱达达 · 发表于 2013-8-14 16:45:57

我也选的A开始，
但想了想，感觉A后面说的是“promote products”, 而原文说的只是一个广告商陈述的不当，歪曲了一个大家都知道的公理，
我是这么理解的。。

Helencats · 发表于 2013-8-14 16:48:03

璐璐爱达达发表于 2013-8-14 16:45
我也选的A开始，
但想了想，感觉A后面说的是“promote products”, 而原文说的只是一个广告商陈述的不当， ...

意思是原文里没说要promote products所以不选？

璐璐爱达达 · 发表于 2013-8-14 16:53:11

Helencats 发表于 2013-8-14 16:48
意思是原文里没说要promote products所以不选？

对，我觉得是，原文主题是说广告商陈述的问题，就是“广告”，而不是“促销产品”，我觉得我们的错误是用了固定思维认为“广告就是促销产品”把两者混一起了，而原文根本没提。。。
ps. 以前考过gmat, 是这种思路做题的。。

Helencats · 发表于 2013-8-16 09:45:04

璐璐爱达达发表于 2013-8-14 16:53
对，我觉得是，原文主题是说广告商陈述的问题，就是“广告”，而不是“促销产品”，我觉得我们的错误是 ...

明白啦~谢谢~~

[你问我答] 阅读36套里的一道逻辑题求解

所属分类: GRE考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块