ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1950|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT2-2-2 求教

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-10-16 22:34:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT2-2-2 求教

2.     Ann: All the campers at Camp Winnehatchee go to Tri-Cities High School


Bill: That’s not true. Some Tri-Cities students are campers at Camp Lakemont.


Bill’s answer can be best explained on the assumption that he has interpreted Ann’s remark to mean that


(A) most of the campers at Camp Lakemont come from high schools other than Tri-Cities


(B) most Tri-Cities High School students are campers at Camp Winnehatchee


(C) some Tri-Cities High School students have withdrawn from Camp Lakemont


(D) all Tri-Cities High School students have withdrawn from Camp Lakemont


(E) only campers at Camp Winnehatchee are students at Tri-Cities High School


求教此题!看不懂其中的推理:Ann说“所有的在CW的露营者要去TC School”,Bill则说“一些TC的学生是在CL的露营者”如何推出E为假设。

沙发
发表于 2004-10-16 23:38:00 | 只看该作者

没贴上,再写一遍。

问题问B将A的话理解成下列哪个选项。因为B说THAT IS NOTTRUE。所以选项必须和B的话矛盾,即MUST BE FALSE。BILL说有些TC的学生在L野营。E选项说所有TC学生在W野营。

only A are B=All B are A

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-17 21:04:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT2-2-2 求教

收到!多谢lawyer_1的解释!遇上否定就犯晕!

地板
发表于 2006-3-17 11:23:00 | 只看该作者
一遇上这种条件就晕
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 03:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部