- UID
- 565371
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-9-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
1.(2次) 原始寂静: V1(BY:ayd12338):政府是否可以have access to citizen's library records and internet records, for the interest of nation security. V2 (BY:zhangxiao91z)AI是这个月的机经:To the interest ofnational security, governments should have access to their citizens' librarycheckout records and Internet activities. LZ练习的时候写过这篇啊!!!结果考试的时候毫无思路,例子举不出...反正当场乱编= =真不知道自己是什么个情况 考古: V1。To the interest of national security, governments should have access to their citizens' library checkout records and Internet activities. V2。是讲政府为了NATION SECURITY 得have access to library 借书记录,and Internet ..history. V3。为了国家安全,政府要不要检查市民的图书借阅和网页浏览信息。 V4。To the interest of national security, governments should have access to their citizens' library checkout records and Internet activities. V5。To the interest of the national security, governments should have the access to their citizens' library XXX and Internet view history. 参考思路: thesis:基本同意,但是要注意隐私的保护和成本的控制 1 provide information specific time and space, the number of criminals, and characteristics of the suspects. enhance the efficiency and productivity 2 deter crimes criminals will not rashly commit the crime at the risk of being recorded. : 3 the privacy of the public 4 the cost is paid by taxpayers 国家会采取一些措施,控制居民接触信息
这是JJ里面的解释,我就想问下这样不算跑题吗??直接偏移到讨论它的cost上去了,不是应该是should or shouldn't 之间argue一下吗??有没有大牛指教一下??还是说怎样都可以 |
|