LSAT-0206-2-15【interpretation】

[attachimg]20072[/attachimg]
key's B

我觉得这里的gap存在于imposing meaning on a work和writer's intentions之间。B说的是facts about the interpreter，文中好像没有提到呀。

为什么C和D不对呢？

This is an interesting question.

The argument says "... so interpretations need not consider the writer's intentions".  But C says "A writer's intensions are relevant to a valid interpretation of the writer's book".  Obviously C is contradict to the argument, and therefore is not an assumption the author relies on.

The argument never touches the issue whether the true intentions of the writer can be known to a critic, therefore, D is not relevant.

Now try deny test on B.  Deny B, we get "A meaning imposed on a literary work does not reflect facts about the interpreter."  If so, the argument, "Any interpretation of a literary work tells more about the critic than about the writer" would fall apart – there won’t be much to reflect about the critic.  Therefore, B is a necessary assumption and the best answer.

先翻译下吧，比较搞的题目。从主体部分开始：对文章的诠释首要是先赋予文章一个涵义而不是发现其内在的涵义，所以其不必考略作者的意图。因此，任何诠释都更多地反映了诠释者而非作者。

这下看起来简单了吧，其实就是一个逻辑上的gap，怎么诠释者赋予它某个涵义就导致了诠释反映了他的啥子了呢?必须假定，这个他给涵义时就反映了他的东东

原来这个interpreter=critic，懂了，谢谢！