LSAT-3-1-5

flywood · 发表于 2004-8-10 23:07:00

5. Economic considerations color every aspect of international dealings, and nations are just like individuals in that the lender sets the terms of its dealings with the borrower. That is why a nation that owes money to another nation cannot be world leader.

The reasoning in the passage assumes which one of the following?

(A) A nation that does not lend to any other nation cannot be a world leader.

(B) A nation that can set the terms of its dealings with other nations is certain

to be a world leader.

(C) A nation that has the terms of its dealings with another action set by that

nation cannot be a world leader.

(D) A nation that is a world leader can borrow from another nation as long as that

other nation does not set the terms of the dealings between the two nations.

(E) A nation that has no dealings with any other nation cannot be world leader.

答案C,理不清思路.

kingsoft · 发表于 2004-8-11 00:28:00

典型的架桥思路

贷款方给借方设置条款——》借钱的国家不能是世界老大

问假设：被设置条款的国家不能是世界老大

Bensontuo · 发表于 2019-8-4 15:12:05

flywood 发表于 2004-8-10 23:07
5. Economic considerations color every aspect of international dealings, and nations are just like i ...

5.

Spot the question type: Sufficient Assumption

Core of the argument, if you owe the money, you can't be world leader.

If you owe the money, you must be borrower.

If you are borrower, you must borrow from the lender sets the terms of its dealing with you.

" If you borrow from the lender sets the terms of it's dealing with you, you can't be world leader. "

C. Perfect Answer.

LSAT-3-1-5

LSAT-3-1-5

LSAT-3-1-5

所属分类: 法学院申请

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()