另类评鉴惊人出炉：全球十大“烂校” （转载）

硬币一定会有两面》：）

1. Even Harvard, Stanford, or MIT produces bad seeds, such as the Enron CFO, Wall-street's Henry Blodget, etc. Why would some reader think that he/she would admire Harvard and Stanford beyond any criticism?

2. The article itself is exagerating one aspect of things (the validity may not even be true) and tries to use one aspect to represent a school.  

生平第一次听说Yale是浮夸大学之鼻祖。我很少在CD上反驳别人，今天破例一次。我引用两个事实来说明：

1）  US News and World Report每年对大学本科进行排名，Yale一直是Top 3；

2）  1995年，美国权威国家机构National Research Council对全美所有博士课程进行了一次综合评估（上一次在1983年，下一次预计在2007年举行），请看结果：

   The universities with the highest totals of top three rankings in the two categories for the 41 fields studied by the National Research Council were: MIT 34, University of California Berkeley 27, Princeton 19, Stanford 18, Harvard 18, Yale 17, Chicago 14, Michigan 10, Caltech 10, UC San Francisco 7, Cornell 7, Duke 6, Columbia 5, Minnesota 4, Wisconsin 4, Johns Hopkins 3, and Illinois (Champaign-Urbana) 3.

In all the fields, Yale had 12 firsts, compared to MIT with 11; Stanford, 11; Berkeley, 9; Harvard, 8; Caltech, 8; Chicago, 6; Princeton, 5; UC San Diego, 3; Michigan, 3; and UC San Francisco, 3.

我想我不用再多说了，大家自己去判断吧。

开什么国际玩笑, 多伦多大学在加拿大可是顶级的, 绝不比哪一家逊色. 倒好, 这么一评, 全加拿大的商学院都得歇菜了.

得, 咱们回家睡觉去!