[求助]第一篇作文 呕心沥血 兄弟姐妹们帮忙改改吧～！

Some people believed that a college or university education should be available to all students. Other believe that higher education should be only available to good students. Discuss these views. Which view do you agree with? Explain why.

Nowadays, whether the current high education system, Education for Elite, is well-formed has brought up a fierce controversy and lead to the vent of two dramatically different views. To find out a reliable conclusion, a spectrum of reasons has been presented. After weighing the pros and cons of both side, I think it obviously make sense for u to keep traditional educating strategy unchanged, that means we should only offer the real good students permissions to college or university.

Whether a student is good can not be judged with a rigid rule, like academic performance. 'Good' is a comprehensive concept that include a series of characteristics, ranging from overall intellectual development to special talent, in fact, most countries already have their well-tried system to assess the students. As long as the applicants has their own long suits and are willing to further their studies, they will surely be regarded as good, qualified students and the door of knowledge will always be open to them. To other students, working experience is much more important than academic background, entering university may not the best choice. In another word, when we say 'we welcome good students only', it should be emphasized that there is no student to be abandoned. What the college or university do is to help the students find out the most suitable way for development.

Students can diversify their choices, entering university to trying other type of lives. While for employers, they also have diversified need —— different job orientations to different positions. IBM is a case in point, its demand for employees varies from those with high professional skill, perfect researching background to those who only need to do some simple work such as typing and cleaning. Not all the employs are required to have a bachelor's degree and to some jobs like driving, having a diploma is absolutely useless. We must realize that, to a certain company, it do need people with with excellent academic attainments, but not for all the positions. So the universities should concentrate on cultivating students with potentials to be advanced designers, researchers, etc, leaving professional training to the companies.

Still another point we should attach much more importance to is that the limited teaching and learning resources make our society can only offer high education opportunity to students who are capable to make full use of it and are really need it. Otherwise some critical problems will arouse. At present, a large sum of universities or colleges in China are enlarging the enrollment trying to make high education available to every person who want it. But as a developing nation with a huge population, the so-called “equal opportunity to be educated” finally lead to unequal. The expansion of university campuses rise the cost of high education, students from impoverished families can hardly afford the high tuition fee. What is more, the amount of college graduates has already far exceeded the social requirements, it is ordinary that hundreds of college graduates compete for one position. Over 31.7 percent of college students can not find a suitable job. To cut a long story short, excessive use will finally lead to ineffective.

Admittedly, universal education is necessary for the modern world, but it should be kept within limits, that is every person gets what they 'really' need.