ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 天堂楼下
打印 上一主题 下一主题

好心人,你快来啊 >.<|||

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2006-7-24 12:18:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用stellaleigh在2006-7-24 12:07:00的发言:

Clearly, government has a responsibility to support the arts. However, if that support is going to produce anything of value, government must place no restrictions on the art that is produced.”

在读以下这句话的语气,我觉得Madben你的理解好像不对啊。

我觉得,如果将produced 改为supported,我会完全赞成你对题目的理解,
government must place no restrictions on the art that is supported


但是在这里,art that is produced和前面提到的 anything of value是什么关系呢?还有if 从句可以用来表目的吗,还是说这是虚拟语气?

请指正。

12#
发表于 2006-7-24 12:24:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用stellaleigh在2006-7-24 12:15:00的发言:

oh, really.

well, if i met this article in my test i will go with my own understanding.

anyway...

In fact, I think your undersanding of the topic makes more sense in general. Somehow, I just couldn't understand clearly the sentence structure. 我可能做语法题做出毛病来了,看什么都看结构,指代等等, 句子真正的意思反而忽略了。

13#
发表于 2006-7-24 12:24:00 | 只看该作者

"不要支持,要支持就" is a bit strong.  It's still possible for the government's support to produce something of no value.

Break it down to 2 parts:

1. It's the government's responsibility to support arts

2. If something of value is desired, then the government shouldn't put constraints on the output.

14#
发表于 2006-7-24 12:35:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用yaoyao99在2006-7-24 12:24:00的发言:

"不要支持,要支持就" is a bit strong.  It's still possible for the government's support to produce something of no value.

Break it down to 2 parts:

1. It's the government's responsibility to support arts

2. If something of value is desired, then the government shouldn't put constraints on the output.

茅塞顿开. Thanks.

15#
发表于 2006-7-24 12:44:00 | 只看该作者
哈哈,我说得太过了。
16#
发表于 2006-7-24 15:47:00 | 只看该作者

我认为其实跑点题目无所谓的,机器先改,人后改,人改的时候肯定已经知道机器的分数了,所以很少有人会故意麻烦找第三个人改的.

内容不是很重要,重要的是结构和连接.

但是如果你申请的学校会看AWA的话还是好好写的好些

17#
发表于 2006-7-26 05:25:00 | 只看该作者
我如果遇到这道题会反对:

1. 享受权利就应该承担义务,否则如果不法分子披着艺术家的外衣违法乱纪,那政府无条件的支持岂不助纣为虐。

2. 有限制就不能产生有价值的东东吗?非也,从古到今,从博物馆到野外,价值连城的艺术品都是在限制更多的情况下完成的,现在社会已经自由开放了这么多,有些必要的限制就不能产生有价值的艺术品了?

3. 让步一下,限制不能过分
18#
发表于 2006-7-26 15:55:00 | 只看该作者
you can first put it in Chinese, then translate back. but don't bet on only one topic.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-14 19:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部