ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 930|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求高人指点

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-7-26 15:57:00 | 只看该作者

求高人指点

LSAT22-3-12


One year ago a local government initiated an antismoking advertising campaign in local newspapers, which it finnaiced by imposing a tax on cigarattes of 20 cents per pack。One year later, the number of people in the locality who smoke cigarettes had declined by 3 percent。 Clearly, what was said in the advertisement had an effect, although a small one, on the number of people in the locality who smoke cigarettes。


Which of the following if true helpse to strengthen the argument?


(D)Merchants in the locailty responded to the local tax by reducing the price at which they sold the cigarattes by 20 percents per pack。


不明白这一答案为何加强了作者的论证??

沙发
发表于 2005-7-29 09:05:00 | 只看该作者
it strengthens because it excludes a possibile reason for the decline in smoking, i.e.an increase in the price of cigarettes
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-16 21:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部