大家好,此题答案是D,可我觉得C也对吧?请牛牛帮忙看看,谢谢.
During the late nineteenth century, many
architects in the United States considered wood,
an abundant North American building product, to
be nature's true material, and they anticipated that
a native style of architecture would emerge from its
proper use. Other architects, however, thought that
wood had serious liabilities and were thus attracted
to solid construction of stone, brick, or concrete. Their
choice was based on economic reasons---
when the price of wood soared, as it occasionally
did, they questioned the financial advantages of
timber and predicted that it would be even more
expensive as American forests became depleted.
They also argued that even though the initial cost of
a timber house was less than that of one in brick,
stone, or concrete (and they often disputed this
point), the long-term expense was greater. They
pointed out that unlike the materials used in solid
construction, timber deteriorated quickly, needed
constant upkeep, and attracted harmful insects and
rodents. More important, timber was combustible.
At a time when major areas of American cities were
frequently destroyed by fires and when new suburbs
did not have efficient fire-fighting systems, the fact
that masonry was fireproof was a compelling argument
in favor of solid construction.
181. The word it in the passage refers to
solid construction
choice
price
timber  |