以下是引用xie999999999在2007-5-13 0:50:00的发言:楼上谢谢你把这个帖子顶上来让我看了这么个陈年好贴! 我觉得第12题主要是有as这个连词在里面,所以they 就不“immediately clear”了。容易误认为是established big businesses 227里面的C指代上确实没问题,就是逻辑上指代defendants,但ETS还是有点嫌they离他太远了,不是致命的毛病,所以说是awkwardly , 就是说这个句子说的比较笨。相比之下B就避免了地理位置上离所指代词远的“问题”。 有趣的是,你看下OG11第102的解释,选项A也是仅仅因为离着远OG就判它错了,虽然我认为选项A确实有修饰歧义的毛病。 指代应按逻辑指代,优先指代前句主语的原则还是成立的。 还有两个几个相关的心得,放在这儿,望批判: 1,一个句子里面有好几个代词,如they,但这些代词都指代一致 2,但类似their 和they就不一定非得一致 (remember the "their wine..., they do' question in OG11) 望大家讨论。 楼上的兄长,我觉得在一个句子中,物主代词和指示代词可以指代不一致。。但是又觉得不好解释。。 请看题目:大全中的 1. Although the coordination of monetary policy can help facilitate the orderly financing of existing imbalances, it is unlikely that its effect on their size is significant in the absence of an appropriate fiscal adjustment. (A) it is unlikely that its effect on their size is significant (B) it is unlikely that the size of their effect would be significant (C) affecting their sizes are not likely to be significant (D) the significance of their effect on its size is unlikely(E) (E) its effect on their size is not likely to be significant 其实这里的A句的话:it,its 如果按照可以指代不一致的话,这句也是成立的。。 按照baiyong书上写的话:unlikely和not likely是不能互换用的。。 所以综上所说,我认为是A。。 但是我不否认E也是对的,所以我很迷惑,代词的指代到底怎么样? 请NN 再次献身。。谢谢。。 |