ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4416|回复: 16
打印 上一主题 下一主题

给大家提醒一下:关于李笑来的作文

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-11-30 20:41:00 | 只看该作者

给大家提醒一下:关于李笑来的作文

 李笑来里面的作文大部分都有问题.所以大家在看的时候一定要注意.

如果基础好点的,比如考了GMAT的人,可以把这本书扔了,因为确实是垃圾.

沙发
发表于 2006-11-30 20:45:00 | 只看该作者
为什么有问题呢,楼主能否具体指出?
板凳
发表于 2006-11-30 21:23:00 | 只看该作者
请LZ说清楚点,不然有误人子弟之嫌,毕竟这书经过了这么多人使用,都没怎么反应有问题
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2006-11-30 21:52:00 | 只看该作者
我有空的时候给大家把那些文章贴出来分析一下.
5#
发表于 2006-11-30 23:18:00 | 只看该作者
啊 我最近看的可都是李笑来的作文呀  楼主有什么更好的推荐呢
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-11-30 23:24:00 | 只看该作者

2. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

 

Obviously, the earliest teachers we have in our lives in most cases are our parents, and they are generally the most involved in the development and education of their children. Yet neither are all parents good teachers nor are those good parents the best teachers.

 

First of all, not all parents are good teachers. As normal individuals, some parents more or less have bad habits. Even though parents almost instinctively devote themselves to cultivating their offspring, the outcome might turn out to be disappointment, 前后两句之间的因果关系不强,或者在后面一句没有体现出来父母的不好之处。for all children tend to unconsciously or subconsciously copy every thing太绝对 from their parents. Another deficiency of parents as teachers is the fact出现了逻辑搭配错误 that most parents are lack of common senses of education. All too often we observe some parents tend to pursue their cherished but failed dream by forcing their children to develop in a prearranged direction. Ironically, if their children did not follow the instructions, the children would be regarded as disobedient or allegedly rebellious. In fact, it is parents rather than their children that virtually disobey common senses.
                    
这句话是废话,与前面的内容无关,没有明显的目的。

 

Moreover没有递进的含义, some parents are qualified as good teachers, but not all of them are the best ones. When children are in the preliminary school, it is not surprising that parents are capable of teaching their children almost every subject even better than professional teachers in the school. But the situation will not last long. We live in a world where knowledge is accumulated by multiplying and at the same time becomes more and more specialized. Therefore, to be a professional in a certain field today takes much longer time than ever before.没有目的
                    
相当于废话 No parent is able to be professional in all fields, though they might be experts in one or more fields. Wise parents often release rather than charge their children as early as possible.  They are aware of the possibility outside the family.
                    
更没有扣住论点。

这一段的目的应该证明but not all of them are the best ones
                    
但后面没有体现出来,偏离了主旨。

 

Parents may, nevertheless, help their children much more than do good teachers. Most parts of children education are virtually beyond teachers' reaches.  It is parents that supplement. Psychology studies have shown us that parents' love sometimes has astonishingly magic power to their children. Albert Einstein's mother and Forest Gump's mother are both good examples. On the other hand, parents might do their children harm more than do bad teachers as well. The natures of those children whose parents have divorced are often severely distorted.这里没有证明比老师糟糕 In a word, it is rather superficial to simply say that parents are the best teachers.

以后有时间再给大家发

7#
发表于 2006-11-30 23:35:00 | 只看该作者

呵呵,楼主经过了G作文的严格训练啊。不过托福作文对逻辑的严谨性要求不是很高,当然楼主的点评是很认真的,非常感谢!

如果楼主有时间也欢迎继续!

8#
发表于 2006-12-1 00:02:00 | 只看该作者

确实是这样,LZ说的从某一方面是有一定道理,但是李的作文书还是值得看看的,我的理解,作文当然如果你能逻辑性很强最好了,但是和中国作文不一样,这个作文考察的是语言能力,逻辑能力在次,所以你语言比较流畅,内容深度差一些是没有关系的,以前GMAT的那个范文内容,仅从内容上看也是很肤浅,但是语言上看,行文结果上看,就还可以。

再者,你写的内容过难,逻辑性太强,老美还不知道能不能理解,他觉得那读着多累呀?他只求通顺,至于意思我像他不会过多考虑的。

也许没有最好,只有更好吧


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-12-1 0:04:37编辑过]
9#
发表于 2006-12-3 13:54:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用suvtong在2006-12-1 0:02:00的发言:

确实是这样,LZ说的从某一方面是有一定道理,但是李的作文书还是值得看看的,我的理解,作文当然如果你能逻辑性很强最好了,但是和中国作文不一样,这个作文考察的是语言能力,逻辑能力在次,所以你语言比较流畅,内容深度差一些是没有关系的,以前GMAT的那个范文内容,仅从内容上看也是很肤浅,但是语言上看,行文结果上看,就还可以。

再者,你写的内容过难,逻辑性太强,老美还不知道能不能理解,他觉得那读着多累呀?他只求通顺,至于意思我像他不会过多考虑的。

也许没有最好,只有更好吧


完全同意.. 这个作文考察的是语言能力,逻辑能力在次,所以你语言比较流畅,内容深度差一些是没有关系的.

G 和 T 在作文方面的考点不同..

李的作文书绝对值得看看的

10#
发表于 2006-12-3 14:12:00 | 只看该作者
我还是等着楼主分析其他作文
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-7 04:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部