OG 261

Avantasia

过去分词本身是可以和现在分词平行的，但是要在它们是形容词的时候，这里的born是was born的缩略，而born做为形容词是“天生的”意思，这里不可能。

推论1：这里是主被动的平行

推论2：主被动平行Awkward

结论：不选

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-6-2 0:20:18编辑过]

Avantasia

恩，MM看的够仔细！（不是祈使句：））

第一题里面Being是现在的时态，born是过去的时态，省略是要省略相同的部分，可是这里面补出助动词，主语一致，但是Be动词不同，虽然时态不同可以平行，但是感觉应该是完整的句子，这样才符合省略的原理。

时间紧，没有资料论证，MM自己看一下吧。

Avantasia

以下是引用阿尔的太阳在2005-9-28 18:14:00的发言：

以下是引用薰衣紫草在2005-4-6 5:59:00的发言：

搜索了半个小时的链接, 还是看不明白.

261. Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940. author Bharati Mukherjee has lived in England and Canada, and first came to the United States in 1961 to study at the Iowa Writers' Workshop.

(A)  Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has

(B)  Having been a United States citizen since 1988, she was born in Calcutta in 1940; author Bharati Mukherjee

(C)  Born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee became a United States citizen in 1988; she has

(D)  Being born in Calcutta in 1940 and having been a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee (C)

(E)   Having been born in Calcutta in 1940 and being a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee

为何OG说:In A, the phrase Being... and born violates parallelism . 我觉得平行的很好啊.

还有, 答案C里怎么可以用逗号, 而且还是用and连接的, 同一主语.

我也不明白，用排除法选c没有问题。 但是c为什么最后用she has? she has lived in England and Canada, and first came to the United States in 1961 to study at the Iowa Writers' Workshop. 平行吗？

有大牛路过救救我吧，实在想不通。

ETS对于平行的界定里面不针对时态，也就是说一句话可以前后时态不统一，把握大语法点。