OG 261

薰衣紫草 · 发表于 2005-4-6 05:59:00

搜索了半个小时的链接, 还是看不明白.

261. Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940. author Bharati Mukherjee has lived in England and Canada, and first came to the United States in 1961 to study at the Iowa Writers' Workshop.

(A) Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has

(B) Having been a United States citizen since 1988, she was born in Calcutta in 1940; author Bharati Mukherjee

(C) Born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee became a United States citizen in 1988; she has

(D) Being born in Calcutta in 1940 and having been a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee (C)

(E) Having been born in Calcutta in 1940 and being a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee

为何OG说:In A, the phrase Being... and born violates parallelism . 我觉得平行的很好啊.

还有, 答案C里怎么可以用逗号, 而且还是用and连接的, 同一主语.

likui · 发表于 2005-4-6 13:49:00

选项里出现being就直接排除吧，这是“公理”；

C里是分号吧，既然用了就是分句子的，同不同主语就不关键了。

薰衣紫草 · 发表于 2005-4-6 23:56:00

我要搞清楚为什么ETS说不平行.

lived in England and Canada , and first came to the United States in 1961 to study at the Iowa Writers' Workshop. 看见逗号了吗?

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-4-8 2:05:56编辑过]

薰衣紫草 · 发表于 2005-4-8 02:07:00

Avantasia · 发表于 2005-4-8 08:05:00

过去分词本身是可以和现在分词平行的，但是要在它们是形容词的时候，这里的born是was born的缩略，而born做为形容词是“天生的”意思，这里不可能。

推论1：这里是主被动的平行

推论2：主被动平行Awkward

结论：不选

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-6-2 0:20:18编辑过]

薰衣紫草 · 发表于 2005-4-8 09:05:00

那来看一下这句句子

OG210. Scientists have recently discovered what could be the largest and oldest living organism on Earth, a giant fungus that is an interwoven filigree of mushrooms and rootlike tentacles spawned by a single fertilized spore some 10,000 years ago and extending for more than 30 acres in the soil of a Michigan forest.

(A) extending

(B) extends

(C) extended

(D) it extended

(E) is extending

spawned与extending平行, 我不觉得这里是形容词的平行.

Avantasia · 发表于 2005-4-8 13:06:00

恩，MM看的够仔细！（不是祈使句：））

第一题里面Being是现在的时态，born是过去的时态，省略是要省略相同的部分，可是这里面补出助动词，主语一致，但是Be动词不同，虽然时态不同可以平行，但是感觉应该是完整的句子，这样才符合省略的原理。

时间紧，没有资料论证，MM自己看一下吧。

Chamao · 发表于 2005-4-8 16:21:00

赞成！Being是现在的时态（且主动），born是过去的时态（且被动），而且有个SINCE 1988表示要用Has been -->故改为having been born才可阿！

weichenli · 发表于 2005-8-25 17:06:00

以下是引用Avantasia在2005-4-8 8:05:00的发言：

过去分词本身是可以和现在分词平行的，但是要在它们是形容词的时候，这里的born是was born的缩略，而born做为形容词是“天生的”意思，这里不可能。

推论1：这里是主被动的平行

推论2：主被动平行Awkward

结论：不选

great explanation thanks!

weichenli · 发表于 2005-8-25 17:31:00

以下是引用薰衣紫草在2005-4-6 23:56:00的发言：

我要搞清楚为什么ETS说不平行.

lived in England and Canada , and first came to the United States in 1961 to study at the Iowa Writers' Workshop. 看见逗号了吗?

我越看越糊塗了!

請問逗號是什麼意思呢?

不是在看 being 跟 born 的比較嗎? came 也有什麼作用嗎? 謝謝

本贴相关题目 OG-12-SC-42 (MKOZ)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

OG 261

OG 261

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()