pyivy 发表于 2013-8-18 22:59 ![]()
8.18 综合
The lecture discusses about whether the only amateur sketch of Jane Austen is the true por ...
The lecture discusses about whether the only amateur sketch of Jane Austen is the true portrait of Jane Austen,(这里同学犯了和我一样的理解错误啊……原文说的是For a long time, the only accepted image of Austen was an amateur sketch of an adult Austen made by her sister Cassandra. However, recently a professionally painted, full-length portrait of a teenage girl owned by a member of the Austen family has come up for sale.即“很长一段时间以来,只有唯一一幅妹妹画的一幅成年画像是被大家认可的,但是最近,A家族的一个成员声称自己拥有一副她的少女画像并想要出售。”所以说本文想证明的是另一副画像,并不是已经公认的唯一那幅妹妹画的画像。) especially whether is painted when Austein was a teenager. There are three reasons as follows,
Firstly, the portrait was published in 1882, several years after Austen's death. It's hard to figure out especially for the people who have never seen Jane Austen.(本段只说明了一个反驳的观点,既没有说明这个观点来自哪里,也没有说明反驳的是谁的观点,有些简陋)
Secondly, it might be some relatives of Austein in the portrait. Austein has a large family, so it is reasonable that some of Austein's family members are
portrayed.(同上)
Finally, the evidence that it is about Austein's teenager is only for the style.
it is shown that by the lecture Austein is older than the girl in the portrait during the same period.
However, the reading passage believes that the portrait is definitely painted when Austein was a young girl.(这三句我看得不是很明白,它们是同一段吗?感觉同学很多细节都没有听出来)
总体印象:
这篇综合写作只写出了一个大概的骨架,应该有的点并没有完整地表述出来。
刚刚稍微统计了一下字数,同学你这篇文是140字,托福综合写作的规定是150~225,少写是很吃亏的,建议多练习听力,加多一些细节。
===========================
下面附上来自无老师的TPO12 的满分范文:
The reading passage suggests that three pieces of evidence provide support that a portrait recently commissioned for sale by a member of Jane Austen's family is of Jane Austen herself when she was a teenager. However, the lecturer rejects such evidence and argues that the painting could not be a portrait of Jane Austen. First, the lecturer argues that the portrait was approved for publication by the Austen family 70 years after Jane Austen's death, suggesting that members of her extended family might have published the portrait without having actually seen her in person. Therefore. the fact that the portrait had been endorsed by her family members does not necessarily prove that it is a portrait of Jane Austen. Second, the lecturer argues that the resemblance between the portrait and an authentic sketch of the adult Jane Austen could be explained by the hypothesis that the portrait is of a relative of Jane Austen when the relative was a teenager. Finally, the lecturer argues that despite the style of the painting, which links it to the exact period when Jane Austen was a teenager, the stamp on the back of the canvas suggests that the portrait was painted at least 27 years after Jane Austen's birth, indicating that the portrait was of someone else who was much older than the teenage Jane Austen.
|