ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1673|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Cynhtia9192求狠拍^_^

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-8-8 12:47:39 | 显示全部楼层 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
8月19日求狠批,望大家不吝赐教!(*^__^*)
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-8-8 21:27:51 | 显示全部楼层
8月8日
What is the main role of the university professor, to educate students or to do research?

On contemporary society, education is enjoying an increasingly high attention from the public. Many problems in the education field make people feel puzzled. Such as to a university professor which should occupy their more time between the research and the education on their students. It seems to be reasonable to many people that professors should pay more time on educating students, nevertheless if we take a deeper consideration; it is not difficult to make the judgment that doing research is the more crucial thing to university professor.  The foremost reason for my standpoint is that if the professor does research well, they can teach students well. The procedure of doing researches is to understand theory more deeply. A report conducted by a certain news agency came to us that about 85 percent professors who get the title of “excellent teacher” are all doing research well. There is no doubt that with the increasing knowledge in the science, professors can answer the question of students more persuasively. They also can help leading students to make hypothesis in a right direction and help them do the research by themselves. As a result, doing research and educating students has a close connection, the more professors focus time on research, the better they teach students.
 Further lending credence to my position is that the quality of the research stands for the strength of the university in the academic field. In the university, we all know that how much and how well the research in the top academic journal is an essential part of the reputation to university. And we know that about 80 percent of the Nobel Prize winners were university professors in the 2011, and their university were becoming more noted. Besides, in my university, a few of my classmates had published research on journals. So professors should make their effort to raise the ability of the university, as well as students.
In addition, even though to some extent, student going to university is to learn knowledge, so you may say that professor should focus time on teaching. However, to university students, self-study ability is a necessary and the basic knowledge is not the main thing that the professor should teach. Students should learn most of it by themselves. The knowledge in a high level is the core in university academic education. Hence what the professor should pay more attention to is the research, in this way, they can help students to go further.
 Therefore taking into account all these factors mentioned above, all the account justifies an unshakable conclusion that doing research is not only benefit for the professors but also contribute to the university and students.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-8-10 13:51:36 | 显示全部楼层
谢谢糖糖~~~糖糖明儿也加油呀!
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2012-8-10 17:16:10 | 显示全部楼层
In the lecture theprofessor states that the memoir is accurate to some extent, and it is a reliablehistorical resource. However, this departs from the reading passage, whichcontends that the memoir that Chevalier wrote is less exciting and glamorousthan it seems. The lecture by the professor, unquestionably, casts doubt on thereading material.
 To begin with, the speaker claims that In theSwitzerland, exactly Chevalier had to pay much on many parties. He got moneyafter he sold. But before he got his money it was a few days. Hence he borrowedsome money before got his money. Contrary to the belief in the lecture, thereading passage maintains that, if he was wealthy he did not have to borrowmoney. Therefore, the lecture directly contradicts what the passage indicates.
  Moreover, the lecture argues that, everynight after Chevalier had the conversation with the Volitaire, he written whathe remembered down on the notes. And when he written the memoir, he regularlyconsulted that notes. The reading material, conflicts with the listeningmaterial, makes the point that the accuracy of the conversation is not reliablebecause that many years has pasted. This is another part where lecturecontradicts the reading.
  Finally, the professor takes the positionthat in the prison many other people had even more power than Chevalier, butthey did not escaped away. Besides, old document informed us that afterChevalier escaped, his room repaired. But the reading illustrates that it is dueto the bribe to Chevalier' jailer and the help of his friends, that he couldescape from the prison. Hence, the contents in the writing passage are totallyjeopardized by the speaker.
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-8-11 00:05:31 | 显示全部楼层
TPO8 综合
  In the lecture the professorstates that the memoir is accurate to some extent, and it is a reliablehistorical resource. However, this departs from the reading passage, whichcontends that the memoir that Chevalier wrote is less exciting and glamorousthan it seems. The lecture by the professor, unquestionably, casts doubt on thereading material.
 To beginwith, the speaker claims that In the Switzerland, exactly Chevalier had to paymuch on many parties. He got money after he sold. But before he got his moneyit was a few days. Hence he borrowed some money before got his money. Contraryto the belief in the lecture, the reading passage maintains that, if he was wealthyhe did not have to borrow money. Therefore, the lecture directly contradictswhat the passage indicates.
  Moreover,the lecture argues that, every night after Chevalier had the conversation withthe Volitaire, he written what he remembered down on the notes. And when hewritten the memoir, he regularly consulted that notes. The reading material,conflicts with the listening material, makes the point that the accuracy of theconversation is not reliable because that many years has pasted. This isanother part where lecture contradicts the reading.
  Finally,the professor takes the position that in the prison many other people had evenmore power than Chevalier, but they did not escaped away. Besides, old documentinformed us that after Chevalier escaped, his room repaired. But the reading illustratesthat it is due to the bribe to Chevalier' jailer and the help of his friends,that he could escape from the prison. Hence, the contents in the writingpassage are totally jeopardized by the speaker.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-21 07:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部