- UID
- 783711
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-7-20
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
TPO8 综合 In the lecture the professorstates that the memoir is accurate to some extent, and it is a reliablehistorical resource. However, this departs from the reading passage, whichcontends that the memoir that Chevalier wrote is less exciting and glamorousthan it seems. The lecture by the professor, unquestionably, casts doubt on thereading material. To beginwith, the speaker claims that In the Switzerland, exactly Chevalier had to paymuch on many parties. He got money after he sold. But before he got his moneyit was a few days. Hence he borrowed some money before got his money. Contraryto the belief in the lecture, the reading passage maintains that, if he was wealthyhe did not have to borrow money. Therefore, the lecture directly contradictswhat the passage indicates. Moreover,the lecture argues that, every night after Chevalier had the conversation withthe Volitaire, he written what he remembered down on the notes. And when hewritten the memoir, he regularly consulted that notes. The reading material,conflicts with the listening material, makes the point that the accuracy of theconversation is not reliable because that many years has pasted. This isanother part where lecture contradicts the reading. Finally,the professor takes the position that in the prison many other people had evenmore power than Chevalier, but they did not escaped away. Besides, old documentinformed us that after Chevalier escaped, his room repaired. But the reading illustratesthat it is due to the bribe to Chevalier' jailer and the help of his friends,that he could escape from the prison. Hence, the contents in the writingpassage are totally jeopardized by the speaker. |
|