TWE-138,Thank u

skyisblue_li

A group is made up of several members and a leader. Whether is it better to be a member of a group than to be a leader of a group. In my point of view, to be a leader is better than to be a member of a group.

The main reason for my propensity for bring a leader is that it can practice and develop my comprehensive capability of settling many difficulties. For example, when I was a leader of a group of teaching assistants, I must face up to many questions, such as helping teachers collect students' assignments together, telling teachers advices from students, mediating the impact between students and the language school I worked for. Even though I must take responsibility to all mistakes no matter it was done by anybody, my ability has gotten greatly developed. But if being a member of a group, my work is very easy and obviously I could not get anything except the salary.

A more essential factor is that being a leader can make more money than being a member of a group. Being the leader of a group of teaching assistant I can get 600 RMB per month from the language school for 16 working hours, in the mean time every member get 400 RMB in the same working time. Furthermore, being a leader other than a member of a group can cultivate person self-confidence greatly.

For the reasons presented above, it is no accident that it’s better to be a leader of a group than to be a member. Being a leader benefit to improve personal widespread ability, make more money than others, and increase self-confidence for us. In the meantime, being a member you only get nothing but money.