以下是引用amandado在2008-9-1 22:14:00的发言:All groups and organizations should function as teams in which everyone makes decisions and shares responsibilities and duties.Giving one person central authority and responsibility for a project or task is not an effective way to get work done.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above?Support your views with reasons and/or specific examples draw from your own work or school experiences ,your observations,or your reading.
Which is a more productive method of achieving a goal: let all group members share in the decision making, duties, and responsibilities, or appointing only one member to make decisions,delegate duties,and take responsiblities? The speaker considers the first path a best one.In my view,however, each alternative is viable in certain circumstances.
Team work, the first choice, has substantial numbers of resources,such as computer egineer,psychology expert,commercial officer,educational master,etc. A good example can illustrate the so-called brainpower ,when two group members who representate different nations come to negotiate,each group compose of more than three persons.why is more than three?How about only one person? The reason is that the members can quickly solve the complex problem that need large rang of knowlege about which only one person know all details.
Though team work has above advantages,we still need someone ,a group leader, take responsiblity for a project.For example,when a group of Chinese old people the first time to travel abroad,Italy or France,they can not talk fluently like a native speaker,however,they know Venice is a great place to go to and  aris is always romantic and attractive to visitors. Can they go wherever they want? Should they have a dinner whenever they wish?The answer is no,because it is not safe especially for the visitors who is the first time to go abroad.That is why we need a guider,who make decision what is the next step to travel,what time to get up,when is luch time and where to meet.
In conclusion,I agree that in some situations the best way to accomplish a task is through teamwork-sharing responsibility,duties and decision making.However,in other situationl,especially those where individual experience is limited or make a final dicision,the most effective means is for one serve as leader and assume ultimate responsibility for completing the job. LZ的文章来讲,观点最终表达没有什么问题,例子也能说明问题.不过语法错误太多,我用黄色标了,你的几个大的语法问题是结构不平行,比较结构使用有问题,逗号和句号使用有问题,指代不清.小问题在于主谓不一致,还有一些拼写错误,特别是长句.所以我感觉如果机器评分这一关会有问题.还有,建议你用英语思维,有些语句象中文,特别是有语法错误的地方. 我用蓝色标出的部分是觉得行文的逻辑和观点有些问题.我个人认为,你的观点是很明确要一个人来做决定,那你为什么不直接在第一段说清楚呢.后面那个it is not safe,我觉得你说的比较主观,容易产生很大的论证漏洞.因为你不能判断因为是VISITOR就NOT SAFE, . 用GMAT的方式说,这Fallacy是oversimplified casual relation. |