placement? productivity?: 我的"偏见" (下: 非名校篇)

fzxc613

First u have to show the number of 学术骗子 is significant.
If 学术骗子 is only a small proportion of the whole population, why do we study this question at the first place?

fzxc613

1. first I don't agree that "Because a single 学术骗子 can easily ruin your life for ever."
They at least contribute their name on the paper to make it easily to publish.
"data driven" 怎么拉? As long as it proves some new insight to the area.


2. I say your question is not meaningful from a view of paper publication, which may be unappropriate here. Ur point that 学术骗子 exists is useful  for a potential applicants. However, the way u provide to solve it is not quite practical, I guess. The degree of Info Asy is quite deep here. U have to consider the cost and benefit to investigate this problem

Because a single 学术骗子 can easily ruin your life for ever.

Your argument is like: "if the number of person who are killed by tigers are insignificant to the whole population, then we do not have to concern about the dangers of confronting tigers at all."

WTF?

How did you even pass your GMAT?

如果你只是为了跟我argue而来argue, 我不会再回应你的任何remark. Such a waste of my time.

-- by 会员 benxu (2011/3/14 6:26:49)

fzxc613

depend on whether u are a independent scholar who has own interest.
If u think need detail instruction from advisor, u may choose the first one

我还想知道一点就是教授自己的发paper的本事和教授对学生的指导程度哪个重要点，比如有的教授自己已经不太在学术上有啥创建了，但是对学生指导很热心，这种教授能跟么？有的教授自己牛，但是对学生基本是放羊不管型。这种是否比前面那种好？

-- by 会员 Ethylene (2011/3/14 7:31:50)

fzxc613

操，你有意思么？还查我背景，大哥你无聊不？我从开始到现在一直都是观点上与你的争论。你看看你呢？


这底下都是另一个帖子你说的话：
"所以说有人读博士读到脑残，出来说话，一点逻辑都没有。
是不是数字和曲线看多了，理解能力反而退化了？
至于你能作出什么档次的东西，i don't give a single dame.
If your opinion is representative in your program, then I am very disappointed of xxx University."


更无聊的是，你觉得你知道我在哪个学校念书,你就牛比了我就会害怕你了么？
你还真以为自己是跟葱了么？不管你是谁，大哥，玩明的玩阴的我都不怕你。


最后给你点建议，看你的帖子知道你研究作的不错。
但你气度太窄。本来是单纯的学术讨论让你演变成了对骂,连学校也骂上了.
你自己不觉得就因为这点事情你还去查我背景有点太阴险了么？

You are not thinking the big picture. Publication is not the more the merrier! A rubbish publication can easily ruin your reputation, especially when you coauthor with those junks.  I hate to say this, but it is clear that you have not been sufficiently trained to think like a true scholar. If your opinion is representative in your program, then I am very disappointed of Pittsburgh.

As for your second point, I understand your concern: It is indeed difficult to tell a no-go program from the rest. But one can never be too careful, and the ex-post cost of failure is way more greater than the ex-ante cost for extra information about the program. In fact, the main purpose of this forum, at least it seems to me, is to minimize the ex-ante cost.

1. first I don't agree that "Because a single 学术骗子 can easily ruin your life for ever."
They at least contribute their name on the paper to make it easily to publish.
"data driven" 怎么拉? As long as it proves some new insight to the area.


2. I say your question is not meaningful from a view of paper publication, which may be unappropriate here. Ur point that 学术骗子 exists is useful  for a potential applicants. However, the way u provide to solve it is not quite practical, I guess. The degree of Info Asy is quite deep here. U have to consider the cost and benefit to investigate this problem

Because a single 学术骗子 can easily ruin your life for ever.

Your argument is like: "if the number of person who are killed by tigers are insignificant to the whole population, then we do not have to concern about the dangers of confronting tigers at all."

WTF?

How did you even pass your GMAT?

如果你只是为了跟我argue而来argue, 我不会再回应你的任何remark. Such a waste of my time.

-- by 会员 benxu (2011/3/14 6:26:49)

-- by 会员 fzxc613 (2011/3/14 6:45:11)

-- by 会员 benxu (2011/3/16 5:31:36)

fzxc613

It's OK. Just don't let the topic become personal attack.
BTW, I'm not at pittsburgh.